2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720003487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the NIH toolbox cognitive battery in children and adolescents: a 3-year longitudinal examination

Abstract: Background The Cognitive Battery of the National Institutes of Health Toolbox (NIH-TB) is a collection of assessments that have been adapted and normed for administration across the lifespan and is increasingly used in large-scale population-level research. However, despite increasing adoption in longitudinal investigations of neurocognitive development, and growing recommendations that the Toolbox be used in clinical applications, little is known about the long-term temporal stability of the NIH-TB, part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However the association with sibling might have differed in a population that had higher representation from families with very low incomes. Finally, the recently reported low reliability of the NIH-Toolbox cognitive battery [ 64 ], which will require further re-assesement, might limit the robustness of findings pertaining to cognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the association with sibling might have differed in a population that had higher representation from families with very low incomes. Finally, the recently reported low reliability of the NIH-Toolbox cognitive battery [ 64 ], which will require further re-assesement, might limit the robustness of findings pertaining to cognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement error will clearly not be the only source of difference for many measurements that are separated by years or in samples that are developing rapidly ( Streiner and Norman, 2008 ). Studies of psychiatric diagnoses and psychopathology in adolescents and adults have reported a wide range of stabilities ( Blázquez et al, 2019 ; Olino et al, 2018 ; Pettit et al, 2005 ; Shankman et al, 2017 ), as have studies of cognition in adolescents ( Taylor et al, 2020 ), suggesting that a stability estimate greater than 0.7 is not necessary for a measurement to reflect meaningful individual differences. Prior work has observed that fMRI activation can be within this range when certain contrasts are used (see the Discussion above), yet the same benchmarks are likely inappropriate for stability across several years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families who were enrolled in ongoing longitudinal studies of neurocognitive development in youth ( Taylor et al, 2020 ; Stephen et al, 2021 ) were invited to remotely complete online surveys following COVID-19 lockdowns. A total of 37 unique families in the greater Omaha, Nebraska area completed the present sub-study examining social and psychological repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%