2021
DOI: 10.1113/ep089629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the hyperaemic response to passive leg movement in young, healthy women

Abstract: Passive leg movement-elicited hyperaemia (PLM-H) provides an index of lower-limb microvascular function. However, there is currently limited information regarding the reliability of PLM-H and no reliability information specific to women. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of PLM-H in women on two separate days. Seventeen young, healthy women [22 ± 3 years old (mean ± SD)] participated in two identical visits including three trials of PLM. Using duplex ultrasound, PLM-H was characterized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data reflecting the reliability of PLM‐induced hyperemia in women were recently published in The Journal (Lew et al., 2021). Prior to this article by Lew and colleagues (Lew et al., 2021), the only available PLM reliability data were presented in a 2017 abstract that included only partial reliability statistics on a group of 15 men and two women (Groot et al., 2017), as well as in a small ( n = 4) subset of participants published by Venturelli et al. (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Data reflecting the reliability of PLM‐induced hyperemia in women were recently published in The Journal (Lew et al., 2021). Prior to this article by Lew and colleagues (Lew et al., 2021), the only available PLM reliability data were presented in a 2017 abstract that included only partial reliability statistics on a group of 15 men and two women (Groot et al., 2017), as well as in a small ( n = 4) subset of participants published by Venturelli et al. (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability was then analyzed using coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and standard error of the measurement (SEM) (Atkinson & Nevill, 1998). Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), while not a true measure of reliability, were included in order to compare the current results to the recently published study, in women, by Lew et al (2021). The CV were calculated to represent intrasubject variation between the three measurements performed each within-day and between-day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations