2006
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4358-1-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function

Abstract: Background: About 3% of infants are born with a tongue-tie which may lead to breastfeeding problems such as ineffective latch, painful attachment or poor weight gain. The Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function (HATLFF) has been developed to give a quantitative assessment of the tongue-tie and recommendation about frenotomy (release of the frenulum). The aim of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of the HATLFF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
52
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation studies have been carried out in recent years with reproducible items that are both anatomical and functional [6, 7]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Validation studies have been carried out in recent years with reproducible items that are both anatomical and functional [6, 7]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amir et al in 2006 affirmed that the classification of Hazelbacker is highly reliable in the recommendation of a frenotomy in newborns [6]. Martinelli et al in 2015 demonstrated that, after a lingual frenotomy, babies with a short lingual frenulum show changes that favour the appropriate standards of breastfeeding and all the symptoms reported by the mothers improved [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A clinical classification was introduced in 1993 by Hazelbaker, who proposed the Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function score. This score consists of morphological and functional aspects (4), but the relevance of this score has been a source of controversy (5,6).…”
Section: Classification Of a Tongue-tiementioning
confidence: 99%