2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Craniocervical Posture Assessment: Visual and Angular Measurements Using Photographs and Radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing Procedure: Posture Alignment Assessment Posture alignment assessment in both groups was performed at the beginning and after the 4-month training period. Standing cervical and shoulder posture was measured with a highly reliable photogrammetric method, [17][18][19] which allows quantitative assessment of postural alterations, 20 and Postural Assessment Software (PAS). This software had already proven to be valid and reliable.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing Procedure: Posture Alignment Assessment Posture alignment assessment in both groups was performed at the beginning and after the 4-month training period. Standing cervical and shoulder posture was measured with a highly reliable photogrammetric method, [17][18][19] which allows quantitative assessment of postural alterations, 20 and Postural Assessment Software (PAS). This software had already proven to be valid and reliable.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 presents the main methodological information of included studies. Although the methodology practically differs in all studies, the feet positioning was assembled in groups and the most common were: with inferior members in parallel and separated by a previously determined distance (Barbosa, Amorin, Zandonade, & Delaprane, 2013;Belli, et al, 2009;Iunes, Cecílio, Dozza, & Almeida, 2010;Iunes et al, 2005;Milanesi et al, 2011;Pezzan, João, Ribeiro, & Manfio, 2011;Sacco et al, 2007;Sacco et al, 2012;Tavares et al, 2013); with the inferior members positioned together (Chiao Yi, Jardim, Inoue, & Pignatari, 2008;Futlanetto, Chaise, Candotti, & Loss, 2011;Furlanetto et al, 2012;Munhoz, Marquez, & Siqueira, 2005); with the individual standing in self-referred or usual posture (Fedorak, Ashworth, Marshall, & Paul, 2003;Gadotti & Biasotto-Gonzalez, 2010;Gadotti, Armijo-Olivo, Silveira, & Magee, 2013;Raine & Towmey, 1994a;Raine & Towmey, 1994b;Salazadeh et al, 2014;Yu Cho, 2007); and standardizing the individual usual posture by using the strategy of outlining the supporting base of each person to utilize as a mold for the photos (Coelho et al, 2013;Coelho et al, 2014;de Almeida et al, 2013;Dunk, Lalonde, & Callaghan, 2005;Ferreira, Duarte, Maldonado, Bersanett, & Marques, 2011;Figueiredo, Amaral, & Shimano, 2012;Glaner, Mota, Viana, & Santos, 2012;Lopes et al, 2014;Miranda, Schor, & Girão, 2009;Pachioni et al, 2011;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the results of this review, there is a huge variety of feet positioning utilized to conduct a semi-static postural evaluation through photogrammetry, however it does not derail the execution of methodological comparisons, as most of the studies determine that the individual stands in a natural or self-referred posture for photos (Fedorak et al, 2003;Gadotti & BiasottoGonzalez, 2010;Gadotti et al, 2013;Raine & Towmey, 1994a;Raine & Towmey, 1994b;Salazadeh et al, 2014;Yu Cho, 2007). According to Smith, Weiss, and Lehmkuhl (1997), the aligned posture is not natural because requires a conscious effort and an increase in muscular activity, so they suggest that the standard feet positioning prioritize body comfort and relaxation instead of a previously determined body alignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forward head and shoulder angles The angle of the head and the shoulder will be measured using photogrammetry according to the procedure described by Seidi et al [15]. The validity and reliability of this method have been established in previous studies [37,38].…”
Section: Scapular Dyskinesismentioning
confidence: 99%