Reliability of the CPRS Between the Disciplines of Psychiatry, General Practice, Nursing and Psychology in Depressed Patients

Montgomery, S.; Åsberg, Marie; Jörnestedt, L.; Thorén, Peter; Träskman, Lil; McAuley, R; Montgomery, D. B.; Shaw, P. W.

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02358.x

Cited by 47 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is consistent with the previous inter-rater reliability study of MADRS/CPRS carried out by Montgomery et al (1978). In this study, we developed a structured interview guide for MADRS 188 n. takahashi ET AL.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

“…The Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) was originally developed as a 10-item subscale of the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale (CPRS) to assess the severity of depressive symptoms seen in patients with depressive disorders (Asberg et al, 1978). It was established in 1979 to assess the severity of illness in patients with depressive disorders, designed to be particularly sensitive in gauging the effects of antidepressant therapy in patients suffering from such conditions (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA)

Takahashi

Tomita

Higuchi

et al. 2004

Human Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of MADRS (MADRSJ) was examined using the structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA) developed by our group. Two or more psychiatrists attended the systematic interview sessions with each subject to evaluate MADRSJ independently, using SIGMA. A total of 18 interviews was carried out for seven patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder. The severity of each item assessed by the raters ranged from 0 to 6 for nine items and from 0 to 4 for one item. The analysis of variance intraclass correlation coefficient inter-rater reliability values for the individual items carried out by two trained personnel ranged from 0.91 to 1.00, while those achieved by three raters ranged from 0.85 to 1.00. The present results suggest that SIGMA is a potentially useful interview guide for assessing ten symptoms of MADRSJ precisely in patients with a depressive disorder.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA)

Takahashi

Tomita

Higuchi

et al. 2004

Human Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…25 The CPRS compromises 65 items and was developed during the 1970s for evaluation of psychiatric treatment effects. It has high reliability 26 and can be used in full or as an "item pool," for example, the MontgomeryÅsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which consists of 10 items from the CPRS. Item 17 of the CPRS represents subjective disturbances of recall compared with previous ability and is distinguished from concentration difficulties.…”

Section: Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

Subjective Memory Immediately Following Electroconvulsive Therapy

Brus¹,

Nordanskog²,

Båve³

et al. 2017

J ECT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES The aims of the present study were to describe the short-term rate of subjective memory worsening (SMW) and identify factors of importance for SMW in a large clinical sample treated for depression with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). METHODS This register-based study included 1212 patients from the Swedish National Quality Register for ECT. Subjective memory worsening was defined as a 2-point worsening on the memory item of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale from before to within 1 week after treatment. Associations between patient characteristics and treatment factors were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS Subjective memory worsening was experienced in 26%. It was more common in women than in men (31% vs 18%; P < 0.001) and more common in patients aged 18 to 39 years than in patients 65 years or older (32% vs 22%; P = 0.008). Patients with less subjective memory disturbances before ECT had a greater risk of SMW. Patients in remission after ECT had a lower risk of SMW. A brief pulse width stimulus gave higher risk of SMW compared with ultrabrief pulse (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.47). CONCLUSIONS Subjective memory worsening is reported by a minority of patients. However, young women are at risk of experiencing SMW. Ultrabrief pulse width stimulus could be considered for patients treated with unilateral electrode placement who experience SMW. Each patient should be monitored with regard to symptoms and adverse effects, and treatment should be adjusted on an individual basis to maximize the clinical effect and with efforts to minimize the cognitive adverse effects.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Funding agencies: Swedish Research Council [523-2013-2982]; Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research

show abstract

“…In dieser Studie war die KVT dem Supportive Counselling in Bezug auf die Positivsymptomatik überlegen (gemessen mit der Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BPRS, von Lukoff et al [1986] Wykes et al [2008]. BPRS = Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [Lukoff et al, 1986]; CPRS = Comprehensive Psychiatric Rating Scale [Montgomery et al, 1978]; PANSS = Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [Kay et al, 1989]; PAS = Psychiatric Assessment Scale [Krawiecka et al, 1977]; PSE = Present State Examination [Wing et al, 1974]; PSYRATS = Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale [Haddock et al, 1994]. NNT = Number needed to treat für das angegebene dichotome Verbesserungskriterium im Vergleich zu ST; NB = nicht berichtet.…”

Section: Wirksamkeit Supportiver Therapie Gegenüber Kognitiver Verhalunclassified

“…Allerdings bleiben eine Reihe von Aspekten ungeklärt. So führte Befriending in der Studie von Sensky et al [2000] bei der Auswertung nach Studienzentren in einem Zentrum zu grö-ßeren Veränderungen als die KVT (gemessen mit der Comprehensive Psychiatric Rating Scale, CPRS, von Montgomery [1978] und der Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) von Andreasen [1989] [Tarrier und Wykes, 2004].…”

Section: Wirksamkeit Supportiver Therapie Gegenüber Kognitiver Verhalunclassified

Supportive Therapie bei schizophrenen Störungen

Klingberg¹,

Jakobi²,

Wittorf³

2010

Verhaltenstherapie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nach der empirischen Absicherung der Wirksamkeit Kognitiver Verhaltenstherapie (KVT) bei schizophrenen Psychosen stellt sich zunehmend die Frage nach den Wirkmechanismen. In diesem Zusammenhang spielt die supportive Therapie (ST) eine bedeutsame Rolle als unspezifische Kontrollbedingung. Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt den derzeitigen Stand der Forschung zur ST bei schizophrenen Störungen dar. Heterogene Definitionen von ST führen dabei zu schwer vergleichbaren Ergebnissen. Eine Theorie möglicher Wirkmechanismen von ST wird erläutert und die Moderator- oder Mediatorfunktion der therapeutischen Beziehung diskutiert. Aufbauend auf der Darstellung der Wirkmechanismen werden eine eigene Konzeption der ST sowie erste Ergebnisse zur Rolle der therapeutischen Allianz aus einer laufenden Studie zu Psychotherapie bei psychotischen Symptomen vorgestellt.

show abstract

Reliability of the CPRS Between the Disciplines of Psychiatry, General Practice, Nursing and Psychology in Depressed Patients

Cited by 47 publications

References 3 publications

The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA)

The inter‐rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA)

Subjective Memory Immediately Following Electroconvulsive Therapy

Supportive Therapie bei schizophrenen Störungen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About