2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test in young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good intrarater reliability was found for the number of touches in the CKCUEST and all directions in the UQYBT. These results corroborate with previous studies that assessed healthy volunteers [5][6][7]12,17,18 and athletes from different sports 3,4,16 . In the UQYBT, the superolateral reach presented the best ICC values; similar results were found in both healthy volunteers 5 and athletes 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Good intrarater reliability was found for the number of touches in the CKCUEST and all directions in the UQYBT. These results corroborate with previous studies that assessed healthy volunteers [5][6][7]12,17,18 and athletes from different sports 3,4,16 . In the UQYBT, the superolateral reach presented the best ICC values; similar results were found in both healthy volunteers 5 and athletes 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the UQYBT, the superolateral reach presented the best ICC values; similar results were found in both healthy volunteers 5 and athletes 3 . In relation to measurement error, for the number of touches in the CKCUEST the SEM was 1 touch, and the SDC was 3 touches, similar results were found in adolescents (SEM = 2.17; SDC = 6.01) 18 and young adults (SEM = 0.93-2.76; SDC = 2.05-4.25) 6,17 . For the UQYBT, SEM values varied between 3 and 7 cm, and SDC between 8 and 19 cm, results that are higher than the SEM and SDC reported in healthy volunteers 5 (SEM = 2.2-2.9; SDC = 6.1-8.1) and throwing athletes 4 (SEM = 1.41-1.77; SDC = 3.91-4.91), but still without systematic error.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Several tests have been developed for this purpose; the most widely used one is CKCUEST [21]. CKCUEST is a simple, valid and low-cost test that can be easily applied in a clinical or sports context and shows high correlation with muscle strength measurements [22]. This test evaluates the function and stability of the upper extremity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test evaluates the function and stability of the upper extremity. It is used in the literature in order to identify risk factors for shoulder pain [23], to determine the effectiveness of different types of intervention [24] and to predict the development of throwing distances [22,25]. In addition, this test can be used to compare athletes and to determine if they can return to sports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) -The CKCUEST was used to assess shoulder performance function and stability according to the protocol suggested by Goldbeck and Davies (Goldbeck & Davies, 2000). The CKCUEST is a measurement with moderate to excellent reliability (de Oliveira et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2019). The CKCUEST presented reliability (ICC) of the average touches score, normalized score, and power score were ranging from 0.77 to 0.92, 0.80 to 0.94 and 0.91 to 0.98, and the minimal detectable change (MDC) values were 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%