2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijge.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Trail Making Test and Stroop Color and Word Test among Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Part B, the circles included both numbers 1 to 13 and the 12 Chinese zodiac symbols (eg, rat, cow, and tiger in Chinese). Participants were required to connect the circles by alternating between the numbers and Chinese zodiac symbols in the correct sequence (ie, 1‐rat‐2‐ox‐3‐tiger) . The score on each part was the number of seconds required to complete the task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Part B, the circles included both numbers 1 to 13 and the 12 Chinese zodiac symbols (eg, rat, cow, and tiger in Chinese). Participants were required to connect the circles by alternating between the numbers and Chinese zodiac symbols in the correct sequence (ie, 1‐rat‐2‐ox‐3‐tiger) . The score on each part was the number of seconds required to complete the task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were required to connect the circles by alternating between the numbers and Chinese zodiac symbols in the correct sequence (ie, 1-rat-2-ox-3-tiger). 33,34 The score on each part was the number of seconds required to complete the task. In this study, we used TMT-A to measure visual-spatial attention and TMT-B to measure alertness.…”
Section: Primary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of inhibition comprised the anti-saccade paradigm (Gooding & Basso, 2008), Flanker test (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974), delay of gratification or delay discounting tasks (Koffarnus & Bickel, 2014;Prencipe & Zelazo, 2005), Simon test (Simon & Wolf, 1963), Stroop task (Stroop, 1935), and stop-and-signal and go/no-go (Verbruggen & Logan, 2008). Accuracy and RT-based scores (e.g., interference effect) on these tests have displayed satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.64-0.86) and two-to four-week significant retest reliability (r = .11-.96) (Martínez-Loredo, Fernández-Hermida, Carballo, & Fernández-Artamendi, 2017;Teichner, Golden, Bradley, & Crum, 1999;Wang, Zhou, Huang, & Yang, 2018;Wöstmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, scores on these measures have shown good convergent validity with other inhibition tests, and discriminant validity with scores on tests of other constructs (Martínez-Loredo et al, 2017;Teichner et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2018;Wöstmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation