2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Temporal Vascular Anastomosis and Techniques for Better Outcomes

Abstract: Background Although there are several potential recipient vessels in the neck, those in the temporal region are limited. In skull base reconstruction, there are difficulties associated with the anastomosing recipient vessels in the neck region since long nutrient vessels are needed in the flap. We evaluated the reliability of temporal vascular anastomosis by comparing surgical outcomes between reconstructive methods and examined which surgical procedures may achieve better results. Methods We examine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection and preparation strategies for recipient arteries and veins have been reported by several authors. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Branches of the external carotid artery, including the superior thyroid artery (STA), are commonly used as recipient arteries for microvascular head and neck reconstruction. 1,11 The STA is preferred because it is often located near to the surgical defect and easy to identify and dissect; however, using the STA has several disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection and preparation strategies for recipient arteries and veins have been reported by several authors. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Branches of the external carotid artery, including the superior thyroid artery (STA), are commonly used as recipient arteries for microvascular head and neck reconstruction. 1,11 The STA is preferred because it is often located near to the surgical defect and easy to identify and dissect; however, using the STA has several disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection and preparation strategies for recipient arteries and veins have been reported by several authors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these treatments, the local soft tissue around the operating field is usually extensively scarred and retracted which might produce external compression on the pedicle and the anastomosis site. Tanaka et al 37 report higher rates of venous complications when using ST vessels for H&N reconstruction and secondary revision procedures compared with skull base reconstruction. The authors cite a wider surgical field, less prone to compression and the frequent usage of the middle temporal vein as the main differences between the reconstruction technique for each indications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proximity these vessels have to the scalp makes them favorable as recipient vessels and despite the above noted possible size mismatch, the efficacy of the superficial temporal vessels has been shown by other authors as well. [27][28][29][30][31] The facial artery and vein can also be selected as recipient vessels. The primary microvascular anastomoses can be done directly from the flap pedicle vessels to the facial vessels when a frontal scalp defect is reconstructed.…”
Section: Recipient Vessel Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%