2016
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of specific physical examination tests for the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: PROSPERO CRD42014009018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose the diagnosis M75 because its subgroups are partially overlapping and often not distinguishable in a clinical assessment. The lack of universally accepted diagnostic classification criteria,34 poor specificity of many physical examination tests35 and inconsistent diagnostic terminology36 may make the clinical diagnosis more or less inaccurate. In this study, we decided to rule out traumas because they were unsystematically recorded in the used registers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the diagnosis M75 because its subgroups are partially overlapping and often not distinguishable in a clinical assessment. The lack of universally accepted diagnostic classification criteria,34 poor specificity of many physical examination tests35 and inconsistent diagnostic terminology36 may make the clinical diagnosis more or less inaccurate. In this study, we decided to rule out traumas because they were unsystematically recorded in the used registers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting the ICC and/or CCC along with associated 95% confidence intervals is good practice for agreement analysis. The results are reported in both primary (such as reliability analysis of the Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale in the evaluation of microbleeds [143], automatic analysis of relaxation parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter [144], and the use of signal intensity weighted centroid in magnetic resonance images of patients with discs degeneration [145]) and secondary research studies (systematic review and/or meta-analysis: evaluation of the functional movement screen [146], evaluation of the Manchester triage scale on an emergency department [147], reliability of the specific physical examination tests for the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies [148], etc. ).…”
Section: Diagnostic Tests and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary aim of this investigation was to (1) determine the prevalence of patients with shoulder impairments classified into the MDT syndromes (i.e. Shoulder Derangement, Shoulder Dysfunction, Posture, and Other) and (2) analyze the interaction between classification and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were calculated for patient characteristics including MDT classifications, patients with intake data only, and patients with intake and discharge data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing a tissue-specific shoulder diagnosis is difficult at best. Numerous reports have shown unacceptable levels of reliability [1,2] and validity [3][4][5][6] for the clinical tests used to establish a pathoanatomical shoulder diagnosis. Furthermore, radiological studies of the shoulder are subject to a high prevalence of incidental findings, and structural abnormalities including rotator cuff pathology [7][8][9][10] and labral tears [11,12] commonly occur in asymptomatic individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%