Reliability of routinely collected anthropometric measurements in primary care

Abstract

Background Measuring body mass index (BMI) has been proposed as a method of screening for preventive primary care and population surveillance of childhood obesity. However, the accuracy of routinely collected measurements has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of height, length and weight measurements collected during well-child visits in primary care relative to trained research personnel. Methods A cross-sectional study of measurement reliability was conducted in community pediatric and family medicine primary care practices. Each participating child, ages 0 to 18 years, was measured four consecutive times; twice by a primary care team member (e.g. nurses, practice personnel) and twice by a trained research assistant. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated using the technical error of measurement (TEM), relative TEM (%TEM), and a coefficient of reliability (R). Results Six trained research assistants and 16 primary care team members performed measurements in three practices. All %TEM values for intra-observer reliability of length, height, and weight were classified as ‘acceptable’ (< 2%; range 0.19% to 0.70%). Inter-observer reliability was also classified as ‘acceptable’ (< 2%; range 0.36% to 1.03%) for all measurements. Coefficients of reliability (R) were all > 99% for both intra- and inter-observer reliability. Length measurements in children < 2 years had the highest measurement error. There were some significant differences in length intra-observer reliability between observers. Conclusion There was agreement between routine measurements and research measurements although there were some differences in length measurement reliability between practice staff and research assistants. These results provide justification for using routinely collected data from selected primary care practices for secondary purposes such as BMI population surveillance and research. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0726-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Precision of Measurements Performed by a Cadre of Anthropometrists Trained for a Large Household Nutrition Survey in Ethiopia

“…Standardization of anthropometric techniques is recognized as one way to achieve high precision among a large number of observers ( 2 ). Apart from major growth studies such as NHANES ( 3 ) or WHO's Multicentre Growth Reference Study ( 4 ), only a few studies have detailed the approach and methods used to standardize anthropometric measurement techniques for infants and young children ( 5 – 13 ). Such methods are of special relevance to program evaluation studies, for which growth is one of multiple data indicators collected and for which anthropometrists (who also double as household interviewers) must also receive training in selection methods, questionnaires, and interviewing techniques ( 14 ).…”

Modifiable Early Childhood Risk Factors for Obesity at Age Four Years

“…Anthropometric measurements were made by trained research assistants using a standardized protocol, thus reducing error associated with using measurements obtained during clinical care visits and recall bias from parentally reported measurements. [55][56][57][58] Independent variables were collected both pre-and postnatally, thus reducing recall bias, and were collected in the context of a cohort study not focused specifically on obesity, hence reducing the potential for acquiescence bias. 59 Weaknesses of this study include the use of parental report of sleep duration, the absence of quantitative measures of dietary intake and of physical activity, and the challenges in both determining screen time exposure and having measures of screen time that remain contemporarily relevant.…”

Dose recommendations for intravenous colistin in pediatric patients from a prospective, multicenter, population pharmacokinetic study

“…Unlike SCr which is measured directly in a blood sample, eGFR needs to be calculated using SCr and height or length. Measuring the height or length in critically ill pediatric patients in bed or infants and young children <2 years of age in a lying position could cause inaccurate results (Carsley et al, 2019, Rasouli et al, 2018. SCr level is correlated with body weight, and gestational age in young infants (Muhari-Stark and Burckart, 2018).…”