Reliability of Postoperative Free Flap Monitoring with a Novel Prediction Model Based on Supervised Machine Learning

Abstract

Background: Postoperative free flap monitoring is a critical part of reconstructive microsurgery. Postoperative clinical assessments rely heavily on specialty-trained staff. Therefore, in regions with limited specialist availability, the feasibility of performing microsurgery is restricted. This study aimed to apply artificial intelligence in postoperative free flap monitoring and validate the ability of machine learning in predicting and differentiating types of postoperative free flap circulation. Methods: Postoperative data from 176 patients who received free flap surgery were prospectively collected, including free flap photographs and clinical evaluation measures. Flap circulation outcome variables included normal, arterial insufficiency, and venous insufficiency. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique plus Tomek Links (SMOTE-Tomek) was applied for data balance. Data were divided into 80%:20% for model training and validation. Shapley Additive Explanations were used for prediction interpretations of the model. Results: Of 805 total included flaps, 555 (69%) were normal, 97 (12%) had arterial insufficiency, and 153 (19%) had venous insufficiency. The most effective prediction model was developed based on random forest, with an accuracy of 98.4%. Temperature and color differences between the flap and the surrounding skin were the most significant contributing factors to predict a vascular compromised flap. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the reliability of a machine-learning model in differentiating various types of postoperative flap circulation. This novel technique may reduce the burden of free flap monitoring and encourage the broader use of reconstructive microsurgery in regions with a limited number of staff specialists.

Machine learning application for prediction of surgical site infection after posterior cervical surgery

“…modelling. 16,17 To improve the model performance, the sample numbers between groups should be balanced and the data should be standardized. The dataset was balanced using the Tomek links (SMOTE-Tomek).…”

Precision and Progress: Machine Learning Advancements in Plastic Surgery

“…In plastic surgery, these algorithms can assist in identifying specific anatomical structures, evaluating tissue characteristics, and detecting abnormalities or tumors. This aids surgeons in preoperative assessment and surgical planning [3,4]. This also allows for more precise and personalized surgical planning [1][2][3][4][5].…”

“…This aids surgeons in preoperative assessment and surgical planning [3,4]. This also allows for more precise and personalized surgical planning [1][2][3][4][5]. Machine learning algorithms can automatically segment different tissues in medical images.…”

“…In plastic surgery, this can be useful for accurately delineating anatomical structures like skin, muscles, and bones. Automated tissue segmentation can save time and improve the accuracy of surgical planning [1][2][3][4][5].…”

Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Insights from Plastic Surgeons, Education Integration, ChatGPT’s Survey Predictions, and the Path Forward

“…AI has found its place in plastic surgery including applications in burns, hand surgery, wound analysis, breast surgery, head and neck surgery, flap monitoring, and aesthetics. [3][4][5] For instance, in burn treatment, AI-powered tools assist in accurately assessing burn severity and recommending optimal treatment options. 6 In hand surgery, AI aids surgeons in precise planning and execution of intricate procedures.…”