“…The efficacy of its results depends heavily on the evaluator's experience 1,[4][5][6] . Although it is considered as a gold standard for vocal evaluation, there is constant mention of possible interferences arising from the subjectivity of evaluators, lack of reliability of judgments, variety of evaluation methods, inconsistencies of instruments and lack of standardization of the terminology used 1,4,[7][8][9][10] . The search for overcoming such limitations is based on different strategies, such as presentation of anchor stimuli, training and calibration of evaluators, repetition of stimuli, application of scripts to randomize the order of presentation of speech samples (programming applicable to open source software), and a statistical approach of perceptual judgments 6,[11][12][13] .…”