“…These figures are comparable with the stature recorded in other most recent studies done in the South Indian female population wherein Nagesh and Kumar 20 reported 153.51 (AE5.83) cm, Rastogi et al 34,35 reported 158.57 (AE5.10) cm, Nachiket et al 36 reported 156.7 (AE6.24) cm, and Mohanty et al 37 reported 156.88 (AE5.83) cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Rastogi et al 34 reported a correlation that ranged from 0.647 to 0.701 when estimating stature from the hand length in the South Indian female population. Nachiket et al 36 reported a correlation of 0.810 when estimating stature from the foot length in the South Indian female population. Mohanty et al 37 reported a correlation of 0.842 and 0.816 when estimating stature from the leg length and the arm span, respectively, in the South Indian female population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Nachiket et al estimated stature of South Indian females from the foot length. 36 Mohanty et al estimated stature of South Indian females from the leg length and the arm span. 37 The importance of the present study lies in the fact that this is the first study to report a linear regression equation for stature estimation from the length of the sternum in the South Indian female population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 However, the standard error of estimating stature from the length of the sternum is greater compared to that when estimating stature from the hand length, foot length, leg length, and the arm span in the South Indian female population. 34,36,37 …”
“…These figures are comparable with the stature recorded in other most recent studies done in the South Indian female population wherein Nagesh and Kumar 20 reported 153.51 (AE5.83) cm, Rastogi et al 34,35 reported 158.57 (AE5.10) cm, Nachiket et al 36 reported 156.7 (AE6.24) cm, and Mohanty et al 37 reported 156.88 (AE5.83) cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Rastogi et al 34 reported a correlation that ranged from 0.647 to 0.701 when estimating stature from the hand length in the South Indian female population. Nachiket et al 36 reported a correlation of 0.810 when estimating stature from the foot length in the South Indian female population. Mohanty et al 37 reported a correlation of 0.842 and 0.816 when estimating stature from the leg length and the arm span, respectively, in the South Indian female population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Nachiket et al estimated stature of South Indian females from the foot length. 36 Mohanty et al estimated stature of South Indian females from the leg length and the arm span. 37 The importance of the present study lies in the fact that this is the first study to report a linear regression equation for stature estimation from the length of the sternum in the South Indian female population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 However, the standard error of estimating stature from the length of the sternum is greater compared to that when estimating stature from the hand length, foot length, leg length, and the arm span in the South Indian female population. 34,36,37 …”
“…The issue becomes more significant in the wake of increased frequency of mass disasters which often leave only commingled remains. This letter refers to an interesting article published in your esteemed journal by Nachiket et al 1 on the reliability of inter-anterior superior iliac spinous distance as compared to foot length for stature estimation in South Indians. We congratulate the authors for their attempt on the estimation of stature from a comparatively rare and new parameter, i.e.…”
Only one study to date has explored the potential of innominate measurements for the estimation of stature in forensic contexts. The acetabulum, however, is among the skeletal regions most resistant to the processes of destruction and often survives intact. In this investigation, diameter, area and perimeter dimensions of the acetabulum were recorded from digital photographs in a documented French sample, consisting of 36 males and 33 females. Linear regression equations for estimating stature were then generated for each dimension in both males and females. Correlation coefficients for the models ranged from r = 0.401 to r = 0.474, and standard error of the estimate (SEE) values were between 5.7 cm and 6.1 cm. The highest correlation coefficients in both sexes were observed for the diameter of the acetabulum. These results indicate that acetabular dimensions should only be used for stature estimation when more accurate bones are unavailable for analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.