The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of inter-anterior superior iliac spinous distance as compared to foot length for stature estimation in South Indians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures are comparable with the stature recorded in other most recent studies done in the South Indian female population wherein Nagesh and Kumar 20 reported 153.51 (AE5.83) cm, Rastogi et al 34,35 reported 158.57 (AE5.10) cm, Nachiket et al 36 reported 156.7 (AE6.24) cm, and Mohanty et al 37 reported 156.88 (AE5.83) cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These figures are comparable with the stature recorded in other most recent studies done in the South Indian female population wherein Nagesh and Kumar 20 reported 153.51 (AE5.83) cm, Rastogi et al 34,35 reported 158.57 (AE5.10) cm, Nachiket et al 36 reported 156.7 (AE6.24) cm, and Mohanty et al 37 reported 156.88 (AE5.83) cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Rastogi et al 34 reported a correlation that ranged from 0.647 to 0.701 when estimating stature from the hand length in the South Indian female population. Nachiket et al 36 reported a correlation of 0.810 when estimating stature from the foot length in the South Indian female population. Mohanty et al 37 reported a correlation of 0.842 and 0.816 when estimating stature from the leg length and the arm span, respectively, in the South Indian female population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The issue becomes more significant in the wake of increased frequency of mass disasters which often leave only commingled remains. This letter refers to an interesting article published in your esteemed journal by Nachiket et al 1 on the reliability of inter-anterior superior iliac spinous distance as compared to foot length for stature estimation in South Indians. We congratulate the authors for their attempt on the estimation of stature from a comparatively rare and new parameter, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%