2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-018-0416-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of HR-pQCT Derived Cortical Bone Structural Parameters When Using Uncorrected Instead of Corrected Automatically Generated Endocortical Contours in a Cross-Sectional Study: The Maastricht Study

Abstract: Most HR-pQCT studies examining cortical bone use an automatically generated endocortical contour (AUTO), which is manually corrected if it visually deviates from the apparent endocortical margin (semi-automatic method, S-AUTO). This technique may be prone to operator-related variability and is time consuming. We examined whether the AUTO instead of the S-AUTO method can be used for cortical bone analysis. Fifty scans of the distal radius and tibia from participants of The Maastricht Study were evaluated with A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Towards the epiphyses of the tibia, cortical bone becomes thinner and is increasingly replaced by a trabecular core, rising concerns about the precision error of cortical bone structural and density measurements performed at distal and ultradistal sites with HR-pQCT [43,44]. Due to the different measurement site (midshaft, here, instead of distal shaft) we observed a cortical thickness of the tibia that was 2 to 3 times larger than values reported from HR-pQCT studies [15,18,4547]. In this sense, the tibia midshaft provided a much larger and homogeneous volume of interest for cortical bone microstructural characterization than the distal shaft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Towards the epiphyses of the tibia, cortical bone becomes thinner and is increasingly replaced by a trabecular core, rising concerns about the precision error of cortical bone structural and density measurements performed at distal and ultradistal sites with HR-pQCT [43,44]. Due to the different measurement site (midshaft, here, instead of distal shaft) we observed a cortical thickness of the tibia that was 2 to 3 times larger than values reported from HR-pQCT studies [15,18,4547]. In this sense, the tibia midshaft provided a much larger and homogeneous volume of interest for cortical bone microstructural characterization than the distal shaft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, the negative results (absence of associations) in this study should be interpreted with caution and larger studies are needed to confirm our results. Third, we used the uncorrected automatically generated endocortical contour for cortical bone analysis, which results in lower values of porosity-related parameters due to less inclusion of the transitional zone [40]. However, a study by Heilmeier et al showed that differences in Ct.Po between patients with T2DM with and without fragility fractures were present in the periosteal and midcortical layer of the cortex, but not in the endosteal layer [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An image processing pipeline using a combination of adaptive histogram equalization, watershed segmentation, iterative Gaussian blurred energy landscapes, and 3D-GAC was established such that 56 out of 60 images were automatically contoured successfully. In our hand-contoured reference dataset, we observed clear inter-operator variability, which is a known issue of hand-contouring bone [27]. On average, the automatically generated contours by the 3D-GAC algorithm agreed well with operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Both approaches were affected by image quality, as expected. However, the 3D-GAC approach only failed for one image with sufficient image quality to be considered for inclusion in HR-pQCT studies [8,27,30]. Trabecular morphometric indices generated using the successful 3d-GAC contours agreed well with those generated using the default manufacturer pipeline with deviations well below the precision error of these indices [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%