1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(05)80004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of hindfoot goniometry when using a flexible electrogoniometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results exceeded r ¼ 0.80 and were similar to those of the A-para [14,17], confirming our hypothesis. These findings also confirm or exceed those reported previously at the foot and ankle [13,23].…”
Section: Intra-rater Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results exceeded r ¼ 0.80 and were similar to those of the A-para [14,17], confirming our hypothesis. These findings also confirm or exceed those reported previously at the foot and ankle [13,23].…”
Section: Intra-rater Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Electrogoniometers demonstrated good reliability for repeated measurement ankle dorsi/plantar flexion [12] and foot inversion/eversion [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Foot eversion/inversion measurements were recorded with a strain‐gauge goniometer (Type M 110, Penny & Giles, Blackwood, UK). The distal end block was taped to the calcaneus and the proximal end block was taped to the calf in line with the distal one according to the suggestions of Ball and Johnson [27] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal end had two silver detection surfaces with a diameter of 12 mm and an interelectrode distance of 20 mm block was taped to the calcaneus and the proximal end block was taped to the calf in line with the centre-to-centre. In order to reduce skin impedance the recording sites were prepared by shaving, distal one according to the suggestions of Ball and Johnson [27] (Figure 1). cleaning with 70% alcohol, and applying electrode gel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hand-held goniometers have introduced quantification 33 they have major drawbacks in measuring ROM; goniometric reliability is unproven with reliability studies often having major flaws in design or analysis 34 . In fact, goniometry has been shown to be unreliable for rearfoot assessment 35,36 and the responsiveness of ankle range of motion measurements is uncertain 30 . These problems with reliability have spurred the design of a number of devices and procedures aimed at measuring ankle dorsiflexion.…”
Section: Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%