2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of heart rate and respiration rate measurements with a wireless accelerometer in postbariatric recovery

Abstract: Recognition of early signs of deterioration in postoperative course could be improved by continuous monitoring of vital parameters. Wearable sensors could enable this by wireless transmission of vital signs. A novel accelerometer-based device, called Healthdot, has been designed to be worn on the skin to measure the two key vital parameters respiration rate (RespR) and heart rate (HeartR). The goal of this study is to assess the reliability of heart rate and respiration rate measured by the Healthdot in compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-min averaged data was in the clinically acceptable regions for at least 99% of both HR and RR measurements, therefore we conclude that the clinical performance of the Healthdot in the current cohort is good. The accuracy of the Healthdot for 5-min averaged data was previously studied in bariatric patients where 90.5% of the HR measurements were within the 5 bpm and 88.5% of the RR measurements were within the 3 rpm threshold [13]. The higher percentages found in the present study could be explained by the higher BMI in the bariatric study population as the presence of subcutaneous fat around the chest might impair accelerometer measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 5-min averaged data was in the clinically acceptable regions for at least 99% of both HR and RR measurements, therefore we conclude that the clinical performance of the Healthdot in the current cohort is good. The accuracy of the Healthdot for 5-min averaged data was previously studied in bariatric patients where 90.5% of the HR measurements were within the 5 bpm and 88.5% of the RR measurements were within the 3 rpm threshold [13]. The higher percentages found in the present study could be explained by the higher BMI in the bariatric study population as the presence of subcutaneous fat around the chest might impair accelerometer measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The Healthdot and reference monitor measurements were synchronized based on the temporal sequence of HR values by applying a means of cross-correlation and by applying manual correction when needed in order to define time offset and drift between the clock of the two devices. Any clock drift were corrected by using linear interpolation of the time base for the Healthdot dataset [13]. Patients with a reference recording length of at least 30 min were included in the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vital parameters were measured using Healthdot (Philips Electronics, Netherlands). Healthdot is a validated remote wearable sensor for continuous measurements of heart rate and respiration rate (RR) based on accelerometer measurements [13]. The device is attached under the lower left rib and can be worn for 14 days (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Monitoring Devicementioning
confidence: 99%