2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of ground reaction forces measured on a treadmill system in healthy dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
59
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, repeated-measure analysis of variance of the variance coefficient on dogs of different breeds on a treadmill regarding the stance time did not show any indication of a training effect (Bockstahler et al 2007); in accordance with this, we started to measure dogs when they showed habituation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, repeated-measure analysis of variance of the variance coefficient on dogs of different breeds on a treadmill regarding the stance time did not show any indication of a training effect (Bockstahler et al 2007); in accordance with this, we started to measure dogs when they showed habituation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…When a treadmill is used, velocity is preassigned and then animals cannot 'choose' speed; for this reason, the appropriate speed should be when different dogs move at the 'same dynamic status'. Given that a dog can walk at a wide range of velocities even at the same gait, data were obtained when dogs developed their maximum velocity at walk.The use of the treadmill with an integrated force platform allowed us to collect parameters under controlled conditions such as velocity or track characteristics, which contribute to obtain more homogenous data; in this way, influence of trial repetitions and deviations in velocity during the repetitions when using single force platform systems is nullified (Bockstahler et al 2007) . An important factor to take into account is the potential variation of parameters by means of the habituation of the animals to the device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, kinetic variables such as the PVF and VI may also be influenced by velocity and acceleration, body weight, animal conformation, and musculoskeletal structure [2, 6, 7, 11, 12]. One strategy to minimize the variability is to normalize the vertical force with canine body weight [1, 3, 5, 6, 12], but differences in individual size and, consequently, the relative velocity can still interfere with the values [3, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increases in locomotor speed are expected to be coupled with increases in muscle excitation in all of the extrinsic muscles, because with increasing speed the mechanical cost of transport increases (Cavagna et al, 1977;Willems et al, 1995) and the force impulse of a given footfall increases [e.g. in dogs (Budsberg et al, 1987;Rumph et al, 1994;Bertram et al, 2000;Bockstahler et al, 2007;Walter and Carrier, 2007;Mölsa et al, 2010;Voss et al, 2010)]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%