2015
DOI: 10.11138/jts/2015.3.1.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of forced internal rotation and active internal rotation to assess lateral instability of the biceps pulley

Abstract: J AbstractPurpose: the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between positive painful forced internal rotation (FIR) and lateral pulley instability in the presence of a pre-diagnosed posterosuperior cuff tear. The same investigation was conducted for painful active internal rotation (AIR). Methods: a multicenter prospective study was conducted in a series of patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic posterosuperior cuff repair. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Disabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12] Several new shoulder tests have been described and validated as additional provocative tests, in certain patient populations, but their results were still unreliable for accurate diagnosis of LHBP. [13][14][15] We assume that these test maneuvers and assessment of LHBT lesions were not sufficient to reflect various planes of shoulder motion and various locations of LHBT lesions. And these tests have a wide spectrum of sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Several new shoulder tests have been described and validated as additional provocative tests, in certain patient populations, but their results were still unreliable for accurate diagnosis of LHBP. [13][14][15] We assume that these test maneuvers and assessment of LHBT lesions were not sufficient to reflect various planes of shoulder motion and various locations of LHBT lesions. And these tests have a wide spectrum of sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%