2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Foot Posture Index individual and total scores for adults and older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is inconsistent with our results, and it may be due to our longer training session (3 hrs) and use of Redmond’s clinical note7 ) for scoring the individual items. Our reported reliability is also inconsistent with that of Aquino et al10 ) , who demonstrated a moderate to good inter- and intra-rater reliability of the total raw FPI-6 score (ICCs 0.45–0.88) in healthy adults. For foot posture classification, this study reports a moderate to substantial intra- and inter-rater agreement for the total FPI-6 score and a fair to almost perfect inter- and intra-rater agreement for the individual items of the FPI-6.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is inconsistent with our results, and it may be due to our longer training session (3 hrs) and use of Redmond’s clinical note7 ) for scoring the individual items. Our reported reliability is also inconsistent with that of Aquino et al10 ) , who demonstrated a moderate to good inter- and intra-rater reliability of the total raw FPI-6 score (ICCs 0.45–0.88) in healthy adults. For foot posture classification, this study reports a moderate to substantial intra- and inter-rater agreement for the total FPI-6 score and a fair to almost perfect inter- and intra-rater agreement for the individual items of the FPI-6.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The FPI-6 demonstrated a strong correlation with the Fastrak TM electromagnetic tracking system (EMT) for predicting foot types6 ) and a good validity with a static lower-limb kinematic model8 ) . For both experienced and inexperienced raters, the FPI-6 has a fair to almost perfect inter- and intra-rater reliability for different age groups9, 10 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When comparing inter-rater reliability of FPI-6 in our study, the ndings in the asymptomatic people group showed good repeatability (ICC; 0.608) as in line with the previous studies [25][26][27]. Whereas the result analyzed in the patient group demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC; 0.878)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Values between 0 and +5 are considered a normal foot, < 0 supinated and > 5 pronated [20]. Intrarater reliability of the total test score was previously determined as moderate to high (ICC of 0.66 with CI between 0.45 and 0.82), and interrater reliability was also moderate to high (ICC of 0.79 with CI between 0.64 and 0.88) [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%