1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00917728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of children's reports of depressive symptomatology

Abstract: The use of self-report measures for the assessment of depression in children has gained wide popularity as a component in the evaluation of children's mental health and well-being. However, the extent to which children are reliable and consistent reporters of their depressive symptoms is sometimes called into question. This study examined the test-retest reliability of children's reports of depressive symptomatology on the Reynolds Child Depression Scale (RCDS; Reynolds, 1989a). The sample consisted of 220 chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, substantial evidence suggests that ratings of parent-child relationships, or of peer relationships, vary considerably depending on whose reports they are based on: a parent's, the target child's, or an "objective" observer's (Achenbach, McConaughy, & Howell, 1987;Hart, Lahey, Loeber, & Hanson, 1994;Kazdin, 1990;Reynolds & Graves, 1989;Rothbaum & Weisz, 1994;Weisz et al, 1988). Moreover, it is clear that none of these reports necessarily captures "the truth" any more than do others.…”
Section: Figure 1 Illustrative Effects Of Moderator Variables In Intmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, substantial evidence suggests that ratings of parent-child relationships, or of peer relationships, vary considerably depending on whose reports they are based on: a parent's, the target child's, or an "objective" observer's (Achenbach, McConaughy, & Howell, 1987;Hart, Lahey, Loeber, & Hanson, 1994;Kazdin, 1990;Reynolds & Graves, 1989;Rothbaum & Weisz, 1994;Weisz et al, 1988). Moreover, it is clear that none of these reports necessarily captures "the truth" any more than do others.…”
Section: Figure 1 Illustrative Effects Of Moderator Variables In Intmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A battery of tests was administered by reading all scale items to the participant and using four flashcards to visually prompt a scale ranging from ''never'' to ''a lot''. Tests included the Beck Anxiety Inventory [23], the Reynolds Child Depression Scale [24], the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire [25] and the Cognitions Checklist [26]. The authors found a high correlation between anxiety and depression in the study group and between negative affect and maladaptive cognitions.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency coefficients are reported to be 0.90 with a test-retest reliability of 0.85 (Reynolds & Graves, 1989). The correlation between the RCDS and other measures of childhood depression, such as the CDI and CDRS, range from 0.7 to 0.79 (Stark, Reynolds, & Kaslow, 1987) and with structured clinical interviews, such as the SADS, at 0.76 (Reynolds, 1989).…”
Section: Reynolds Child Depression Scale (Rcds)mentioning
confidence: 99%