Reliability of centre of pressure summary measures of postural steadiness in healthy young adults

Santos, Brenda R.; Delisle, Alain; Larivière, Christian; Plamondon, André; Imbeau, Daniel

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.05.008

Cited by 122 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It was therefore concluded that fractal analysis is a superior tool for COP investigations. In a later study, Santos et al [17] did not support this conclusion. Their results show that fractal dimension data sets have comparable reliability values to traditional measures.…”

Section: Cop Parametersmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…Where ICC models were reported, the twoway random effect model (ICC2,1) was employed most often. Two studies [16,17] used the related generalizability theory.…”

Section: The Statisticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the literature, sampling frequencies ranging from have been reported [9,16,17,22,27,[37][38][39][40][41] and it seems that the reported variations in COP reliability across similar experimental setups are at least partially due to the different frequencies chosen.…”

Section: Sampling and Cut-off Frequencymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, it has been stated that averaging two [35], three [24], four [38] or seven [17] trials yields acceptable reliability for the majority of COP parameters.…”

Section: Number Of Repetitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The test–retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions – A systematic review of the literature

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Cop Parametersmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…Where ICC models were reported, the twoway random effect model (ICC2,1) was employed most often. Two studies [16,17] used the related generalizability theory.…”

Section: The Statisticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sampling and Cut-off Frequencymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, it has been stated that averaging two [35], three [24], four [38] or seven [17] trials yields acceptable reliability for the majority of COP parameters.…”

Section: Number Of Repetitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The test–retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions – A systematic review of the literature

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A survey of the PubMed MEDLINE database and a review article (Ruhe et al, 2010) shows that some articles (Corriveau et al, 2000;Lafond et al, 2004;Lin et al, 2008;Salavati et al, 2009;Santos et al, 2008) assessed the reliability of the force plate examination, considering only the intrasession variability, obtaining excellent results. The intersession reliability was the subject of a recent study by Perinetti et al (2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intersession reliability of a posturo-stabilometric test, using a force platform

Baldini

Nota

Assi

et al. 2013

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tAim of the study: To evaluate the intersession reliability of a posturo-stabilometric examination. Methods: Single blind clinical trial conducted in two sessions over two weeks. 44 healthy volunteers free from postural and temporomandibular disorders. All the subjects complied with the criteria for completing the study. All the subjects underwent two sessions of posturo-stabilometric examinations in different visual and mandibular conditions. Sway area, sway length and the coordinates of the center of pressure were evaluated and statistically analyzed using the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Conclusions:The posturo-stabilometric examination carried out using a force platform has a good intrasession and intersession reliability, especially considering sway velocity, COP X and COP Y parameters. The force platform usefulness in analyzing static posture is confirmed in any medical field.

show abstract

Relation between postural control assessment with eyes open and centre of pressure visual feedback effects in healthy individuals

Boudrahem

Rougier

2009

Exp Brain Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual feedback (VFB) of the resultant centre of pressure (CP(Res)) is a potentially interesting technique for rehabilitation purposes. However, all past studies have not been unanimous in supporting its utility in a physical therapy program. The present study was therefore undertaken with the main aim of assessing whether insights from postural control without additional feedback could be gained to explain the possible VFB effects. The CP(Res) displacements of 65 healthy adults were analysed in two conditions (eyes-open and VFB) through various classical parameters (including surface and variances along each medio-lateral and antero-posterior axes) and fractional Brownian motion (fBm) modelling. The results indicate that 69% of the sample were dependent on VFB, i.e. that the surface covered by the CP(Res) displacements was smaller during VFB than in the eyes-open condition. The comparison of the two subgroups (i.e. those who were dependant on VFB and those who were not) brought out significant differences in many classical and fBm parameters. In addition, the correlation between the degree of VFB dependency and the values measured during the eyes-open condition indicates that the more the subjects are VFB-dependent, the less they lean forward, the smaller the variance and the better the CP(Res) displacements are controlled over the longest time intervals. By specifying the links between the postural performance in an eyes-open standard condition and the degree of VFB dependency, a number of clues help identify the reasons for which some subjects do not succeed in using this technique, hence explaining the controversy about its use as a rehabilitation tool.

show abstract

Reliability of centre of pressure summary measures of postural steadiness in healthy young adults

Cited by 122 publications

References 23 publications

The test–retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions – A systematic review of the literature

The test–retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions – A systematic review of the literature

Intersession reliability of a posturo-stabilometric test, using a force platform

Relation between postural control assessment with eyes open and centre of pressure visual feedback effects in healthy individuals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About