2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of center of pressure measures within and between sessions in individuals post-stroke and healthy controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
44
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was expected that lower ICC values would be observed in post-stroke subjects since they exhibit a higher variability inherent to deficits in postural control (Roerdink et al, 2006). Similar to the findings of Gray et al (2014), the values of within session reliability of the retest were lower as compared to those found in the test session. Possible causes could be related to the attention invested in the task and learning effects.…”
Section: Retestmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was expected that lower ICC values would be observed in post-stroke subjects since they exhibit a higher variability inherent to deficits in postural control (Roerdink et al, 2006). Similar to the findings of Gray et al (2014), the values of within session reliability of the retest were lower as compared to those found in the test session. Possible causes could be related to the attention invested in the task and learning effects.…”
Section: Retestmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Despite their potential clinical applicability, to the best of the authors' knowledge, studies have not examined the reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the synchronization and amplitude of postural sway in post-stroke patients. Gray et al (2014) evaluated the within and between sessions reliability of the amplitude of postural sway of each foot as independent entities, and Eng and Chu (2002) and Gasq et al (2014) examined the weight-bearing symmetry. However, these studies did not investigate the MDC of the aforementioned measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2C for pressure sensor data). COP velocity, as a measure of the mean speed of the COP, represents a highly reliable parameter of postural control in healthy older adults (Lin et al, 2008; Moghadam et al, 2011), as well as in patients with neurological conditions (Gray et al, 2014; Tamburella et al, 2014). In line with the fNIRs data, the sampling interval of the COP velocity during the eight-second recording was set at 500 ms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All balance trials were 15 seconds long and involved standing as still as possible on a force plate, with their arms at their sides and their feet shoulder-width apart, while looking at a tape "X" on the wall in front of them. This test duration is long enough to be reliable (13,14), and short enough so that the effects of the spinning would be captured. All testing was performed in a quiet room with no visual or auditory distractions.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%