1992
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.149.12.1674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of best-estimate diagnosis in genetic linkage studies of major psychoses: results from the Quebec pedigree studies

Abstract: Since several previous linkage studies used diagnoses made by diagnosticians who were not blind to the status of the probands and the relatives or did not use a consensus best-estimate diagnosis, further reliability studies of different aspects of the best-estimate method and of its effect on linkage studies are needed. Such research is imperative given the serious impact of diagnostic misclassifications on genetic linkage results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described previously (e.g., Kiss et al, 2007; Tamás et al, 2007), caseness for each proband was established during the original study via a stringent procedure that included standardized psychiatric diagnostic evaluations (involving the youth and a parent informant) by trained interviewers (child psychiatrists and psychologists), each of whom generated DSM-IV mood-disorder diagnoses, and a final best-estimate diagnosis (Maziade et al, 1992). DSM-IV diagnoses were based on the ISCA-D, a semi-structured interview derived from the ISCA (Sherrill & Kovacs, 2000), which has been described in detail in previous publications (Baji et al, 2009; Kiss et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described previously (e.g., Kiss et al, 2007; Tamás et al, 2007), caseness for each proband was established during the original study via a stringent procedure that included standardized psychiatric diagnostic evaluations (involving the youth and a parent informant) by trained interviewers (child psychiatrists and psychologists), each of whom generated DSM-IV mood-disorder diagnoses, and a final best-estimate diagnosis (Maziade et al, 1992). DSM-IV diagnoses were based on the ISCA-D, a semi-structured interview derived from the ISCA (Sherrill & Kovacs, 2000), which has been described in detail in previous publications (Baji et al, 2009; Kiss et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, proband youth were recruited from 23 child mental health and guidance facilities across Hungary, along with probands’ siblings within 3 years of age. All subjects underwent a stringent assessment procedure that included: a standardized psychiatric diagnostic evaluation using a semistructured interview (each involving the child and a parent informant) by trained interviewers who generated DSM IV diagnoses and independent verification of the diagnoses by pairs of trained child psychiatrists, via “best estimate” consensus (Maziade et al, 1992). Diagnoses of the probands and siblings in the current study also were subjected to consensus reviews by senior clinicians.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described previously (2021), caseness for each proband was established via two standardized psychiatric diagnostic evaluations by different interviewers about 1 month apart, followed by independent verification of the diagnosis by the consensus best-estimate diagnostic procedure (22). We used the Interview Schedule for Children and Adolescents - Diagnostic Version (ISCA-D), a semi-structured psychiatric interview (for more detail, see 20), which is an extension and modification of an earlier semi-structured Interview (23); parent and child each separately served as informants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%