2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Achilles Tendon Resting Angle and Calf Circumference measurement techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study found a difference in strain (1.2%) between participants with IAT and controls that was similar in magnitude to that of previous studies comparing participants with midportion Achilles tendinopathy to controls (Arya and Kulig, 5 0.8%; Child et al, 8 1.8%). Methodological differences, such as a passive or active task, 32 range of ankle excursion, 18 and determining the tendon length, 7 can affect values when comparing across studies. For example, it would be anticipated that during an isometric contraction, as performed in the studies of Arya and Kulig 5 and Child et al, 8 the strain would be greater than during a passive task, 32 as performed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study found a difference in strain (1.2%) between participants with IAT and controls that was similar in magnitude to that of previous studies comparing participants with midportion Achilles tendinopathy to controls (Arya and Kulig, 5 0.8%; Child et al, 8 1.8%). Methodological differences, such as a passive or active task, 32 range of ankle excursion, 18 and determining the tendon length, 7 can affect values when comparing across studies. For example, it would be anticipated that during an isometric contraction, as performed in the studies of Arya and Kulig 5 and Child et al, 8 the strain would be greater than during a passive task, 32 as performed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these reports show that edema in the lower extremities could increase calf circumference, participants in these studies were younger and healthier than those in the current study. One study reported that ankle joint angle is concordant with calf circumference in assessing for muscle mass, with a standardized error of 0.5–0.6 cm . Considering the size, the measurement error of calf circumference would be assumed to be <1.0 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study reported that ankle joint angle is concordant with calf circumference in assessing for muscle mass, with a standardized error of 0.5-0.6 cm. 26 Considering the size, the measurement error of calf circumference would be assumed to be <1.0 cm. The increase in calf circumference in the current study is much greater than the measurement error; therefore, the increase might be considered to have been induced by edema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, patients might not register impairments leading to decreased physical capabilities, and a high ATRS might be due to low demands of the tendon and not a well-functioning tendon. Following this argument, a physical endurance test like the heel-rise work test [35] or a measurement of tendon length [28, 29] might constitute better primary endpoints. However, these measurements are very specific and do not describe the tendon’s actual capability to function in everyday life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%