1979
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.135.2.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of a Schedule for Rating Personality Disorders

Abstract: The inter-situational, inter-rater and temporal reliability of a schedule for rating personality disorders is described. In an initial study with a simplified form of the schedule in patients from different wards of a psychiatric hospital inter-situational reliability between raters was higher for patients with personality disorders than with no personality disorder. Using the full schedule, inter-rater reliability, using audiotaped and separate interviews, and temporal reliability at interviews conducted a me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Personality was assessed in the majority of patients using the Personality Assessment Scale [24], which was completed with the patient and/or informant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personality was assessed in the majority of patients using the Personality Assessment Scale [24], which was completed with the patient and/or informant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these was that health anxietyfocused CBT (CBT-HA) would be less effective in patients who had additional comorbid pathology in the form of obsessional symptomatology [measured using the Short Obsessive-Compulsive disorder Screener (SOCS)]. 17 We also hypothesised that personality status would have an impact on the effectiveness of treatment, and that those with dependent personalities [measured using the Dependent Personality Questionnaire (DPQ)] 18 and other personality disorders 19 [measured using the Quick Personality Assessment Schedule (PAS-Q)], 20 which were subsequently converted into International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Edition (ICD-11) 21 personality disorder categories, 22 would have a worse outcome with CBT-HA. We also expected that these comorbid disorders would be associated with increased costs.…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following assessments were carried out at baseline only: l personality assessment using the PAS-Q, 20 followed by conversion to the ICD-11 personality levels 22 but also including the questions from the hypochondriasis subsection of the full schedule 19 l the SOCS 17 (a set of seven questions that identify the likely presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder); and l the DPQ, 18 an assessment of dependent personality traits (this was included because both dependent personality and obsessional symptoms are associated conditions that may handicap or complicate treatment).…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-tekrar test ve görüşmeciler arası güvenilirliğin yeterli düzeyde olduğu bulunmuştur. [56,57] Hızlı Kişilik Değerlendirme Çizelgesi (Rapid Personality Assessment Schedule; PAS-R)…”
Section: Dsm-iii-r'deki Kişilik Bozukluklarına Yönelik Yapısal Görüşmunclassified