2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05236-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability framework for characterizing heat wave and cold spell events

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For UEH risk quantification, prevalent methodologies emphasize temporal durations, elevated temperature thresholds, and standard deviation metrics [6,24,25]. However, these paradigms, in their insularity, may inadvertently obfuscate the true magnitude of UEH, especially when bereft of a holistic comprehension of its frequency, intensity, and duration [26]. Analogously, UER risk assessments have harnessed diverse tools, ranging from statistical process control charts to advanced simulation models [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For UEH risk quantification, prevalent methodologies emphasize temporal durations, elevated temperature thresholds, and standard deviation metrics [6,24,25]. However, these paradigms, in their insularity, may inadvertently obfuscate the true magnitude of UEH, especially when bereft of a holistic comprehension of its frequency, intensity, and duration [26]. Analogously, UER risk assessments have harnessed diverse tools, ranging from statistical process control charts to advanced simulation models [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%