2006
DOI: 10.3139/120.100199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability evaluation of NDT techniques for Cu-welds for risk assessment of nuclear waste encapsulation

Abstract: In order to handle the long living radioactive waste (spent nuclear fuel) SKB is planning to build a deep repository that requires no monitoring by future generations. The spent nuclear fuel will be encapsulated in copper canisters consisting of a graphite cast iron insert shielded by an outer 30-50 mm thick copper cylinder for corrosion protection. The most critical part of the encapsulation process is the sealing of the canister, which is done by welding the copper lid to the cylindrical part of the copper s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulated defects are also significant for quantitatively evaluating and finding the limits of NDT&E technologies. Probability of detection (PoD) analysis as a quantitative measure is widely used to evaluate the inspection reliability of traditional NDT&E techniques (Ahmad, 1989;Muller et al, 2006). As a statistical method, PoD requires a large number of samples having defects ranging from non-detectable to minimum detectable sizes and larger (Peeters et al, 2018).…”
Section: Simulated Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulated defects are also significant for quantitatively evaluating and finding the limits of NDT&E technologies. Probability of detection (PoD) analysis as a quantitative measure is widely used to evaluate the inspection reliability of traditional NDT&E techniques (Ahmad, 1989;Muller et al, 2006). As a statistical method, PoD requires a large number of samples having defects ranging from non-detectable to minimum detectable sizes and larger (Peeters et al, 2018).…”
Section: Simulated Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a 90 would mean the crack size has a probability of detection of 90% and a 90/95 means the crack size has a confidence level of 95%. This means that a crack with a size of a will be detected with a probability of 90% and, if this POD exercise is repeated, 95% of the results will fall inside this confidence limit [4,6] .…”
Section: Estimating Probability Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%