2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability estimates for flawed mortar projectile bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One pressuretime curve was not from an 81-mm mortar, but rather from a 60-mm mortar (ref. 4), as the maximum gun-launch pressure was known to be similar and represent a conservative upper bound. A second pressure-time curve was reconstructed from data on a zone 4 charge fired in an 81-mm mortar at 21 °C (ref.…”
Section: Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One pressuretime curve was not from an 81-mm mortar, but rather from a 60-mm mortar (ref. 4), as the maximum gun-launch pressure was known to be similar and represent a conservative upper bound. A second pressure-time curve was reconstructed from data on a zone 4 charge fired in an 81-mm mortar at 21 °C (ref.…”
Section: Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shell body was modeled as HF-1 steel with assumed yield strength of 552 MPa (ref. 4). The material properties of the fuze and composition B were estimated and included for weight and stiffness.…”
Section: Materials Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation