2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability enhancement using optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, ODS outperforms DS and DE in terms of simulation time. Table 9 shows that, for the multi-objective formulation, the average value of objective function obtained by ODS algorithm is close to the minimum value to a greater extent as compared to the average and 3,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,16,19,20,21,22,23,26,28,31 ,32 1041400 8069900 DS 0 -0 6999200 3, 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 32 822162 7821362 ODS 0 -0 6768300 2,3 ,4,5,9, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 1041400 7809700 minimum values of DS algorithm and DE. This proves ODS to be better in terms of robustness.…”
Section: Description Of the Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, ODS outperforms DS and DE in terms of simulation time. Table 9 shows that, for the multi-objective formulation, the average value of objective function obtained by ODS algorithm is close to the minimum value to a greater extent as compared to the average and 3,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,16,19,20,21,22,23,26,28,31 ,32 1041400 8069900 DS 0 -0 6999200 3, 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 32 822162 7821362 ODS 0 -0 6768300 2,3 ,4,5,9, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 1041400 7809700 minimum values of DS algorithm and DE. This proves ODS to be better in terms of robustness.…”
Section: Description Of the Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many studies have focused on network reconfiguration [16][17][18][19][20]. Kavousi-Fard and Akbari-Zadeh [21] proposed a multi-objective improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm for network reconfiguration in order to optimise reliability indices and active power loss. An artificial immune systems optimisation has been utilised by Alonso et al [22] for multi-objective distribution system reconfiguration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete data of the system for load flow can be found in [29]. Also, for the reliability studies, the required data are taken from [24]. The nominal voltage level of the system is 12.66 kV.…”
Section: A Case Study Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, after the first time allocation of the switches in the network, there is no need of any extra investment. Some of the main benefits of the optimal DFR can be named as: power loss reduction [16]- [19], voltage profile enhancement [20], [21], increasing load balance [22], reducing the system total costs [23], and reliability enhancement [24], [25]. While the DFR strategy can always be considered as an available strategy for improving the power system situation, the existence of uncertainty in the DFR problem can reduce the dependability of the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional power systems, network reconfiguration adds to the accompanying advantages, which a few researchers have tested by employing smart routines, like decreasing system power losses [13,14], effective restoring system [15], enhancing system reliability [16], and balancing load [17]. The primary contrast between these networks is the presence of numerous vitality merchants with different conditions for offering energy in a focused cost [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%