2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.g000903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-Based Soft Landing Trajectory Optimization near Asteroid with Uncertain Gravitational Field

Abstract: This paper investigates a reliability-based trajectory optimization method for the design of soft landing trajectory on an irregular shape asteroid with highly uncertain gravitational field. First, the gravitational field of the irregular asteroid is described by the finite particle model. Second, to avoid the singularity and reduce the sensitivity, the original finite particle model is modified to an "N-body/two-body" switching dynamic model. The trajectory optimization problem in the switching dynamic model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lantoine et al [89] proposed a combination of direct and indirect methods to ensure the accuracy and reduce the solution time; Gao et al [90] improved the overall performance of the navigation control system by optimizing the landing trajectory to ensure the observability of the system state; Hu et al [91][92] proposed a small object attachment trajectory anti-difference optimization method to reduce the trajectory tracking error while optimizing the fuel consumption; Ren et al [93] improved the reliability of the optimization results by considering the uncertainty of the small object mass distribution in the attachment trajectory optimization problem based on the reliability theory. In terms of explicit feedback guidance, Hawkins et al [94] designed an autonomous asteroid attachment feedback guidance method based on zero-controlled displacement deviation/zero-controlled velocity deviation with reference to Earth re-entry guidance; Furfaro et al [95] proposed a multi-slip mode surface descent guidance method based on higher-order sliding mode control theory with good robustness to bounded unmodeled upturns.…”
Section: Autonomous Descent Guidance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lantoine et al [89] proposed a combination of direct and indirect methods to ensure the accuracy and reduce the solution time; Gao et al [90] improved the overall performance of the navigation control system by optimizing the landing trajectory to ensure the observability of the system state; Hu et al [91][92] proposed a small object attachment trajectory anti-difference optimization method to reduce the trajectory tracking error while optimizing the fuel consumption; Ren et al [93] improved the reliability of the optimization results by considering the uncertainty of the small object mass distribution in the attachment trajectory optimization problem based on the reliability theory. In terms of explicit feedback guidance, Hawkins et al [94] designed an autonomous asteroid attachment feedback guidance method based on zero-controlled displacement deviation/zero-controlled velocity deviation with reference to Earth re-entry guidance; Furfaro et al [95] proposed a multi-slip mode surface descent guidance method based on higher-order sliding mode control theory with good robustness to bounded unmodeled upturns.…”
Section: Autonomous Descent Guidance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shooting methods are gradient-based algorithms [4], meaning it is extremely sensitive to the smoothness of the shooting function. However, according to (28) and (30), the optimal control law for u o is of a bang-bang control type, and the optimal control law for u a cannot guarantee the smoothness due to its ''ρ a = 0'' case, either.…”
Section: ) Ode Of the Angular Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density is estimated by where ρ 0 is the density on the surface of Mars, r 0 is the mean radius of Mars, h s is the constant scale height and κ , which lies in [−0.3, 0.3], is used to denote the uncertainty of the atmospheric density. 21…”
Section: Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%