2014
DOI: 10.1299/mej.2014dsm0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-based multiobjective optimization using the satisficing trade-off method

Abstract: This study proposes a reliability-based multiobjective optimization (RBMO) approach using the satisficing tradeoff method (STOM). STOM is a multiobjective optimization method that obtains a highly accurate single Pareto solution, regardless of the shape of the Pareto set. By introducing an aspiration level, STOM transforms the multiobjective optimization problem into the equivalent single objective problem. When the given Pareto solution is not satisfactory, the search process is repeated with a different aspi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…d L and d U are the upper and lower bounds of the design variables, respectively. In this study, STOM [Kogiso et al, 2014] is applied to solve the multiobjective optimization problem. The algorithm of STOM is described as follows.…”
Section: Formulation Of Stom In Multiobjective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…d L and d U are the upper and lower bounds of the design variables, respectively. In this study, STOM [Kogiso et al, 2014] is applied to solve the multiobjective optimization problem. The algorithm of STOM is described as follows.…”
Section: Formulation Of Stom In Multiobjective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sinha [Sinha, 2007] extended this design problem to RBMO by adding the door deflection velocity as the objective function and obtained the Pareto solution by using the multiobjective genetic algorithms, NSGA-II. One of the author applied the STOM to this problem and obtained more accurate Pareto solutions [Kogiso et al, 2014].…”
Section: Crash Worthiness Problem For Side Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zhu et al built a comprehensive evaluation model of multiple factors from the perspective of aesthetics, ergonomics, and performance [33]. Kogiso et al used the weighting method to complete the reliability optimization design of a car body [10]. Zhang et al used the grey relational theory and weighting method to complete the reliability optimization design of mechanical products [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%