2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-based inspection and maintenance planning of a nuclear feeder piping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a system with active and standby components operating simultaneously and standby components that are prone to degradation, Golmohammadi & Ardakan (2022) [148] proposed a novel reliability model. An improved standard I&M plan for nuclear feeder piping systems was suggested by Bismut et al (2022) [149] using a reliability-based planning paradigm. The three essential components of shop floor managementmaintenance, production scheduling, and quality-were presented by Tambe & Kulkarni (2022) [150] as an integrated planning approach.…”
Section: Maintenance and Maintainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a system with active and standby components operating simultaneously and standby components that are prone to degradation, Golmohammadi & Ardakan (2022) [148] proposed a novel reliability model. An improved standard I&M plan for nuclear feeder piping systems was suggested by Bismut et al (2022) [149] using a reliability-based planning paradigm. The three essential components of shop floor managementmaintenance, production scheduling, and quality-were presented by Tambe & Kulkarni (2022) [150] as an integrated planning approach.…”
Section: Maintenance and Maintainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that failures are not self-announcing 25,26 and that a failed unit may continue to operate, albeit with (possibly) reduced performance. Thus, due to the presence of measurement errors, it is also supposed that a perturbed measurement of the degradation state of the unit does not permit to assess with certainty whether a unit is already failed or not.…”
Section: Cdf Of Rulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the idea of OR evaluation is put out, which is described as a system capacity to generate a desired output in real time [9]. Further, the results of operational reliability evaluations serve as the foundational data for condition-based maintenance [10]. OR is a product of the in-depth development of reliability based on failure data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%