2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-based evaluation of design code provisions for circular concrete-filled steel columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a measure of the ratio between the strength of a structural element, a given by a simplified calculation model, and the actual strength, as tested. For steel-concrete composite columns under centric axial load, some information on model errors exist [7,8,14]. However, our literature survey resulted in no such results for eccentric loading.…”
Section: Model Errormentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a measure of the ratio between the strength of a structural element, a given by a simplified calculation model, and the actual strength, as tested. For steel-concrete composite columns under centric axial load, some information on model errors exist [7,8,14]. However, our literature survey resulted in no such results for eccentric loading.…”
Section: Model Errormentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The calibration process for NBR 8800 was studied in [6], but the suggested safety factors were never incorporated in the actual code. In the specific case of composite structures, only isolated evaluations of safety factors are found in the literature [7][8][9][10][11]. The main objective of this work is to study the safety of partially-encased steel-concrete composite columns (Figure 1), submitted to compressive bending, and designed according to NBR 8800 [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration was conducted ensuring that the safety level of the new codes reflected the general safety level of old codes, which was regarded as result of collective knowledge and experience-based optimization over the years. This process was well documented in the literature (Ellingwood et al, 1980;Ellingwood and Galambos, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Recent studies by the authors (Beck and Dória, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2008;Beck et al, 2009) reveal that the reliability index of structures designed according to Brazilian code NBR8800:2008 lie in the range from β = 2.3 to β = 4.5. Therefore, in this study, the target reliability index was first selected as β T = 3.0.…”
Section: Partial Factors To Obtain β β β β T = 30 Exactlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is part of a larger project about the calibration, based on structural reliability, of the partial factors from Brazilian design codes. The calibration is being developed by the authors of this paper, though it has already been addressed in a preliminary way by Beck and Doria [5], Beck et al [6], Chaves et al [7] and Beck and Souza Jr. [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%