2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The found critical elements or sets of elements can then be studied in more detail using probabilistic methods of risk analysis [10].…”
Section: Definition and Ranking Of Critical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The found critical elements or sets of elements can then be studied in more detail using probabilistic methods of risk analysis [10].…”
Section: Definition and Ranking Of Critical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a certain extent, this interpretation of vulnerability is similar concept of risk, which is seen as encompassing the estimation of probabilities of risk scenarios and associated negative consequences [19]. However, rather than assessing probabilities and consequences, the focus of analyzing vulnerability is to systematically explore the effects of failures for the purpose of identifying system weakness that may be vulnerable to exploitation by unknown or unimagined threats [20,25]. From this point of view, addressing the vulnerability factors of urban rail transit system involves answering the following question: what factors have the propensity to turn into the weaknesses that resulted in the failure of the system?…”
Section: Vulnerability Factors Of Rail Transit Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, designers give the improvements and apply them on product. Reliability engineers evaluate product's reliability after completing the functional design through reliability analysis [6,12,19], simulation [9,18], test [2,4] etc. The achievement of the requirements would be ensured according to the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%