1983
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198309)39:5<712::aid-jclp2270390511>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity study of a Sufi personality typology: The enneagram

Abstract: Initiated research on a Sufi personality typology that describes nine life stretegies as depicted by a nine‐sided figure called the enneagram. Through workshops and classes, a S pool was formed that consisted of 390 adult and college‐age Ss (311 females and 79 males) who knew the enneagram system well enough to type themselves. The stability of the typing was found to be satisfactory. The Myers‐Briggs and Millon personality inventories were administered to the Ss, and on both instruments significantly differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these parallels between the enneagram and counseling/psychology, research on the enneagram to date is limited to a handful of articles and dissertations. Early enneagram research (e.g., Dameyer, 2001;Edwards, 1991;Gamard, 1987;Newgent et al, 2004;Randall, 1980;Sharp, 1994;Thrasher, 1994;Twomey, 1996;Wagner & Walker, 1983;Wolf, 1992) was concerned primarily with the development and/or evaluation of valid and reliable scales to assess the nine orientations and yielded mixed results. In a review of the empirical literature on the enneagram, Newgent et al (2002) attributed the inconsistency to insufficient sample sizes and underdeveloped psychometric cross-validation inventories.…”
Section: Empirical Research On the Enneagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these parallels between the enneagram and counseling/psychology, research on the enneagram to date is limited to a handful of articles and dissertations. Early enneagram research (e.g., Dameyer, 2001;Edwards, 1991;Gamard, 1987;Newgent et al, 2004;Randall, 1980;Sharp, 1994;Thrasher, 1994;Twomey, 1996;Wagner & Walker, 1983;Wolf, 1992) was concerned primarily with the development and/or evaluation of valid and reliable scales to assess the nine orientations and yielded mixed results. In a review of the empirical literature on the enneagram, Newgent et al (2002) attributed the inconsistency to insufficient sample sizes and underdeveloped psychometric cross-validation inventories.…”
Section: Empirical Research On the Enneagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Everyone may contain all nine types, no one is pure personality. all are basic types of mixed personality, but one type Y. F. Wang et al DOI: 10.4236/jss.2019.74021 268 Open Journal of Social Sciences will be the main factor that determines one's thoughts, feelings and behaviors (Wagner and Walker, 1983) [9].…”
Section: The Relationship Of Enneagram and Decision-making Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es una escala que evalúa los esquemas de pensamiento, el manejo emocional y la forma de actuar y clasifi ca la personalidad en nueve tipos fundamentales (23). La prueba se dirige a mayores de 18 años y su aplicación es individual o colectiva, con una duración de 60 minutos (24). A pesar de ser uno de los cuestionarios más antiguos para evaluación de la personalidad, su validación aún se encuentra en proceso.…”
Section: Eneagramaunclassified