Reliability and Validity of the English Version of the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)

Sadiqi, Said; Dvorak, Marcel F.; Vaccaro, Alexander R.; Schroeder, Gregory D.; Post, Marcel W M; Benneker, Lorin Michael; Kandziora, Frank; Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; Schnake, Klaus John; Vialle, Emiliano; Öner, F. Cumhur

doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000003514

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also moderate to excellent test-retest reliability was obtained for all individual items. This is in agreement with findings from Sadiqi et al 8,9 in the previous psychometric studies for the AO Spine PROST with a follow-up up to 12 months.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Subsequently, patients had to master the Dutch language and not have cognitive impairments. In accordance with previous validation studies of the AO Spine PROST, patients with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade C, D, and E were included 8,9. Patients with AIS grade A and B were excluded as the AO Spine PROST was specifically designed to measure HRQoL in patients with AIS grade C, D, and E 8,9.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In accordance with previous validation studies of the AO Spine PROST, patients with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade C, D, and E were included. 8,9 Patients with AIS grade A and B were excluded as the AO Spine PROST was specifically designed to measure HRQoL in patients with AIS grade C, D, and E. 8,9 Patients suffering polytrauma (injury severity score > 15) were excluded due to the different cause influencing HRQoL.…”

Section: Target Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This tool is developed specifically to measure the function and health status in patients after their spine trauma. Previous validation studies on the Dutch and English language versions of the AO Spine PROST had a follow-up until 12 months 8,9…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Long-Term Reliability and Validity of the AO Spine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)

Buijs

Gendt

Sadiqi

et al. 2022

Spine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-sectional validation study.Objective. The aim was to validate the AO Spine Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (PROST) at a minimum of 12 months posttrauma and to evaluate patient characteristics, types of spine fractures, and treatment strategies as determinants of AO Spine PROST scores. Summary of Background Data. The reliability and validity of the AO Spine PROST as a measure of health-related quality of life for more than 12 months after onset of spine trauma is unclear. Materials and Methods. Patients with a traumatic spine injury were recruited from a level-1 trauma center. They were asked to complete the AO Spine PROST, EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), and either Oswestry disability index (ODI) or neck disability index (NDI) for concurrent validity. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating the Cronbach α and item-total correlation coefficients. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Spearman correlation tests were performed for the AO Spine PROST in correlation with the EQ-5D-5L, and either ODI or NDI. Determinants for AO Spine PROST score were analyzed using multivariate regression models. Results. A total of 175 patients participated in the cross-sectional arm and 49 in the test-retest arm of the study. Median duration of follow-up was 94.5 months. No floor or ceiling effects were seen. Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.98, item-total correlation coefficient. 0.73-0.91) as well as test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81). Satisfactory correlations were seen for the EQ-5D-5L (0.76; P < 0.001), ODI (0.69; P < 0.001), and NDI (0.68; P < 0.001) with the AO Spine PROST. Multivariate linear regression models showed that having ≥ 1 comorbidities, duration of return to work within the range of 7 to 43 months and no return to work were significant independent determinants for a worse AO Spine PROST score. Conclusions. Very good long-term reliability and validity results were found for the AO Spine PROST.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Target Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Long-Term Reliability and Validity of the AO Spine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)

Buijs

Gendt

Sadiqi

et al. 2022

Spine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thoracolumbar fractures comprise more than half of spinal fractures. The annual incidence of thoracolumbar fractures has been reported 30-60 per 100,000 inhabitants [1,2]. The overall prevalence of thoracolumbar fractures is higher in men, more frequent between the ages of 18-49 years old [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic Parameters in Diagnosis of Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Diagnosing the status of the posterior ligament complex (PLC) plays an essential role in the management of patients with thoracolumbar fractures. In this study, due to the inefficiency of existing imaging modalities in the accurate detection of PLC damage, we investigated the relevance of some imaging parameters to specific guidelines for rapid PLC injury detection. Methods and Materials/Patients: In this study, 50 patients with and 50 patients without PLC injury were included. MRI, CT scan, and radiographic imaging of the thoracolumbar spine (T12-L1) were evaluated. The thoracolumbar injury classification systems such as Denis, TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Scoring System), and McCormack Load Sharing and radiographic parameters such as Superior Inferior Endplate Angle (SIEA), Body Height (BH), Local Kyphosis (LK), Interspinous Distance (ISD), and Interpedicular Distance (IPD) were investigated in these patients for each imaging method. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Version 21). Result: The ISD and LK and BHp (Body Height Posterior) were significant predictors of PLC injury. On radiographs, the mean LK with and without PLC damage was 25.67° and 20.92°, respectively (p<0.001). The ISD difference was 6.75 mm in cases with PLC damage and 2.84 mm in cases with an intact PLC (p<0.0001). In CT images, the mean LK was 25.77° in cases with PLC damage and 18.63° in cases with an intact PLC (p<0.037). The ISD difference was 4.14 mm in patients with PLC damage and 2.19 mm in patients without PLC damage (p<0.002). The BHp difference was 9.44 mm in cases with PLC damage and 11.09 mm in cases without PLC damage (p<0.002). Conclusion: The current study suggests formulating a predictive radiological index to identify PLC injury successfully. These guidelines can be very helpful in emergency room decision-makings, especially when the cost, availability, and time of performing MRI are important concerns in patients with multiple trauma.

show abstract

A disease-specific patient reported outcome instrument for spine trauma is developed, validated and available! Re: Andrzejowski et al. Measuring functional outcomes in major trauma: can we do better?

Sadiqi

Öner

2022

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliability and Validity of the English Version of the AOSpine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)

Cited by 10 publications

References 33 publications

Long-Term Reliability and Validity of the AO Spine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)

Long-Term Reliability and Validity of the AO Spine PROST (Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma)

Radiographic Parameters in Diagnosis of Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury

A disease-specific patient reported outcome instrument for spine trauma is developed, validated and available! Re: Andrzejowski et al. Measuring functional outcomes in major trauma: can we do better?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About