2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0859-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detecting perinatal common mental disorders (PCMDs) among women in low-and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundThe Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), originally developed in Britain, is one of the most widely used screening instruments for assessing symptoms of the Perinatal Common Mental Disorders (PCMDs) of depression and anxiety. However, its potential to detect PCMDs in culturally diverse low- and lower-middle income countries (LALMICs) is unclear. This systematic review aimed to appraise formally validated local language versions of the EPDS from these resource-constrained settings.MethodsFollo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
142
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
142
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This symptom scale was designed to eliminate somatic indicators of depression (Pereira et al, 2014a); however it also contains a question more aligned with anxiety than depression, and thus may not indicate the presence of MDD alone (Boyd et al, 2005). Notably, this instrument has been validated in fourteen different languages, and may thus be an important tool in countries with poor access to psychiatric resources (Shrestha et al, 2016). Studies included in our analyses administered the EPDS using differing cut-off scores to determine the presence of symptoms, complicating our ability to compare prevalence between studies; we found cut-off values ranging from ten to fifteen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This symptom scale was designed to eliminate somatic indicators of depression (Pereira et al, 2014a); however it also contains a question more aligned with anxiety than depression, and thus may not indicate the presence of MDD alone (Boyd et al, 2005). Notably, this instrument has been validated in fourteen different languages, and may thus be an important tool in countries with poor access to psychiatric resources (Shrestha et al, 2016). Studies included in our analyses administered the EPDS using differing cut-off scores to determine the presence of symptoms, complicating our ability to compare prevalence between studies; we found cut-off values ranging from ten to fifteen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have used this instrument during the antenatal and/or postpartum period [15] [16]. In the present study we used the Japanese version of EPDS, which shows good internal consistency and test-retest reliability [17].…”
Section: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (Epds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found that when the diagnostic interviews for EPDS were done in the local language, questions may not have been understood as the questions were not culturally adapted (28).…”
Section: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (Epds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(where EPDS was translated into local languages) had lower precision for identifying the true cases of PCMD compared to the original English version (28).…”
Section: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (Epds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation