2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development-II in Korean Preschool Children: Applying AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The psychometric properties of the TGMD-2 have been evaluated and the manual reports excellent test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability (r > 0.85) as well as a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85 and 0.88 for locomotor and object control subtests, respectively). Construct, content, and concurrent validity have also been determined for children aged 3 to 10 years [48][49][50]. Two experienced assessors scored the TGMD-2, with excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.99).…”
Section: Instruments and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychometric properties of the TGMD-2 have been evaluated and the manual reports excellent test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability (r > 0.85) as well as a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85 and 0.88 for locomotor and object control subtests, respectively). Construct, content, and concurrent validity have also been determined for children aged 3 to 10 years [48][49][50]. Two experienced assessors scored the TGMD-2, with excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.99).…”
Section: Instruments and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the reliability studies selected in this review were focused on balance (n = 12 [55 %] studies) [19,21,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The tests used to assess balance were many and very heterogeneous, aiming mainly to assess static and dynamic balance.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During our search we identified a number of studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria or did not study reliability, validity or relationship with health of fitness tests, but used the handgrip-strength [43][44][45][46][47][48] and standing longjump tests [41,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] for measuring musculoskeletal fitness, different versions of the shuttle-run test for measuring speed/agility [30,41,49,51,[55][56][57], or the one-leg-stance test (different versions) for measuring balance [41,53,55,58,59] in preschool children. No problems were reported during testing sessions.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Fitness Testing In Preschool Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 10 articles selected, 6 presented all validity and reliability criteria analyzed in this study (Hartman, Jonker, & Visscher, 2010;Hua et al, 2013;Kim, Han, & Park, 2014;Simons et al, 2008;Valentini, 2012). The other four articles, however, presented incongruences with regard to the criteria adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When analyzing each battery separately, it could be observed in the articles about the TGMD-2 battery that, among the five articles found (Picture 2), four presented all psychometric elements needed to validate and/or adapt a motor assessment instrument (Kim et al, 2014;Simons et al, 2008;N.C Valentini, 2012). In a study by Seonijin et al, (2014), however, the lack of applicability was observed with regard to the criterion validity and inter/intra-rater reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%