1989
DOI: 10.3143/geriatrics.26.617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the GBS scale.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dementia diagnosis or symptoms are not necessarily recognized in general hospitals (Crowther et al, 2017); hence, the dementia care benefit was applied to patients who have communication-related challenges, or who have symptoms and/or behaviors that interfere with daily life, and those who need personal care. Therefore, inpatients details were extracted if they had any signs of cognitive impairment including: (1) difficulty in living alone due to cognitive impairment, (2) one or more behaviors against treatment instruction, (3) harmful behaviors/signs observed, (4) presence of cognitive impairment based on the scale under public long-term care insurance program, or (5) three or more score in Japanese version of Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer's Disease (FAST) (Reiberg et al, 1984;Homma et al, 1989).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dementia diagnosis or symptoms are not necessarily recognized in general hospitals (Crowther et al, 2017); hence, the dementia care benefit was applied to patients who have communication-related challenges, or who have symptoms and/or behaviors that interfere with daily life, and those who need personal care. Therefore, inpatients details were extracted if they had any signs of cognitive impairment including: (1) difficulty in living alone due to cognitive impairment, (2) one or more behaviors against treatment instruction, (3) harmful behaviors/signs observed, (4) presence of cognitive impairment based on the scale under public long-term care insurance program, or (5) three or more score in Japanese version of Functional Assessment Staging of Alzheimer's Disease (FAST) (Reiberg et al, 1984;Homma et al, 1989).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychiatric symptoms” (six items, 0–36 points). Lower scores indicated better conditions [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of cognitive impairment used the Japanese version of ADAScog (ADASJcog) created by Honma et al [6]. The diagnosis of the severity of dementia was made from the overall point of ADASJcog.…”
Section: Cases and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We retested ADASJcog after an average of about 1.5 years for cases diagnosed with normal or mild dementia levels by the first ADASJcog (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Japanese edition) test [6] at the time of initial diagnosis. In this report, (1) the relationship with each task of cognitive impairment was analyzed in patients with mild dementia diagnosed with the value at the time of re-examination; in addition, (2) the factors of deterioration and improvement were analyzed by comparing the case which changed from normal to mild dementia and the case which improved normally from mild dementia at the time of re-examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%