1995
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: A paper-and-pencil version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Clinical Interview.

Abstract: A self-report, paper-and-pencil version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS; M. Hamilton, 1960) was developed. This measure, the Hamilton Depression Inventory (HDI; W. M. Reynolds & K. A. Kobak, 1995) consists of a 23-item full form, a 17-item form, and a 9-item short form. The 17-item HDI form corresponds in content and scoring to the standard 17-item HDRS. With a sample of psychiatric outpatients with major depression (n = 140), anxiety disorders (n = 99), and nonreferred community adults (n = 118)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
123
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Much later, Reynolds and Kobak developed and tested a paper-and-pencil self-report version called the Hamilton Depression Inventory (HDI) (Reynolds and Kobak 1995). Reliability data on a self-report version of the HAM-D expanded to include "atypical" symptoms (SIGH-SAD; see below) were published in 1991 (Terman et al 1991).…”
Section: The Present (1980-2000)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much later, Reynolds and Kobak developed and tested a paper-and-pencil self-report version called the Hamilton Depression Inventory (HDI) (Reynolds and Kobak 1995). Reliability data on a self-report version of the HAM-D expanded to include "atypical" symptoms (SIGH-SAD; see below) were published in 1991 (Terman et al 1991).…”
Section: The Present (1980-2000)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A measure of depressive symptoms, derived from the short form of the Hamilton Depression Inventory (Reynolds and Kobak, 1995), was based on the presence and severity of nine depressive symptoms, with the time frame for items being either the prior 2 weeks or current symptoms. The measure had a range from 0 to 30.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HAM-D is a well validated, clinician-rated instrument to ascertain the presence and severity of depressive symptoms resulting from any psychiatric (or non-psychiatric) cause (Hamilton, 1960;Haroutune, Pratt, Gallo, & Eaton, 1998). It has demonstrated discriminate validity between individuals diagnosed with depression and non-depressed controls (Reynolds & Kobak, 1995), and reliability (showing comparable severity) across racial/ethnic groups (Akpaffiong, Kunik, Hale, Molinari, & Orengo, 1999), albeit with variations in symptoms (Wohi, Lesser, & Smith, 1997). The HAM-D is interviewer-rated and takes ~15 minutes to complete.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%