Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0)

Erbay, Öznur; Yıldırım, Yasemin; Çalışkan, Gülbahar; Girgin, Nermin Kelebek

doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2021.08.001

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cultural adaptation refers to the systematic preparatory studies conducted in order for an assessment tool to be applicable in different cultures and languages. Cultural adaptation is not limited to translation, but it aims to find the cultural target language equivalents of concepts represented by a text’s wording in original language (Aksayan & Gözüm, 2002; Dalli et al, 2022). The most frequently used methods for translating a scale from its original language into a target language are “one-way translation”, “group translation” and “back translation”, the latter being the most common (Aksayan & Gözüm, 2002; Çapık et al, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Death Literacy Index

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Death literacy is defined as a set of knowledge and skills that make it possible to gain access to, understand, and act upon end-of-life and death care options. This study was conducted to test the validity and reliability of the 29-item original version of the Death Literacy Index (DLI) in Turkish society. The scale was applied on a sample of 436 Turkish adults determined using the snowball sampling method. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. The scale consisted of 6 subscales. The test-retest analysis of this study showed a strong and highly significant positive correlation between overall DLI (.98) and its subscales (.73–.98). The total Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of DLI was found to be .90. It was observed that the Turkish version of DLI was a valid and reliable tool and suitable for use in Turkish society.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Death Literacy Index

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A revised 25‐item version of the PUKAT tool (PUKAT 2.0) also showed good psychometric properties for assessing PU prevention knowledge 20,21 . This instrument contains 25 multiple‐choice items, each consisting of five response alternatives, including an “I don't know the answer” option.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The knowledge instruments have been evaluated in different cultural contexts. 21 , 22 The original version of the PUKAT was translated from English into Swedish, 23 but the PUKAT 2.0 version of the instrument has not yet been validated in a Swedish context with OR nurses.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…19 A revised 25-item version of the PUKAT tool (PUKAT 2.0) also showed good psychometric properties for assessing PU prevention knowledge. 20,21 This instrument contains 25 multiple-choice items, each consisting of five response alternatives, including an "I don't know the answer" option. The items were designed to address six themes: Aetiology (6 items), Classification and Observation (4 items), Risk Assessment (2 items), Nutrition (3 items), Pressure Ulcer Prevention (8 items) and Specific Patient Groups (2 items).…”

Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The knowledge instruments have been evaluated in different cultural contexts. 21,22 The original version of the PUKAT was translated from English into Swedish, 23 but…”

Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Swedish translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool for use in the operating room

Falk-Brynhildsen

Raepsaet

Wistrand

et al. 2022

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Swedish operating room version of PUKAT 2.0. In total, 284 Swedish operating room nurses completed the survey of whom 50 completed the retest. The item difficulty P-value of 14 items ranged between 0.38 and 0.96 (median 0.65). Three items were found to be too easy (0.90-0.96). The D-value of 14 items ranged between 0.00 and 0.42 (median 0.46). Three items had a D-value lower than 0.20 (0.11-0.16) and eight items scored higher than 0.40 (0.45-0.61). The quality of the response alternatives (a-value) ranged between 0.00 and 0.42. This showed that nurses with a master's degree had a higher knowledge than nurses with a professional degree (respectively 9.4/14 versus 8.6/14; t = À2.4, df = 199, P = 0.02). The ICC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.78). The ICCs for the domains varied from 0.12 (95% CI = À0.16-0.39) to 0.59 (95% CI = 0.38-0.75). Results indicated that 11 of the original items contributed to the overall validity. However, the low participation in the test-retest made the reliability of the instrument low. An extended evaluation with a larger sample should be considered in order to confirm aspects of the psychometric properties of this instrument.knowledge, operating room nurse, pressure ulcer, psychometric evaluation, PUKAT2.0 Key Messages• a Swedish version of the pressure ulcer assessment instrument for use in an operating room (PUKAT OR) was developed and psychometrically validated • PUKAT OR showed satisfactory psychometric properties, but further studies with a larger sample are needed to confirm the results

show abstract