2021
DOI: 10.26650/eor.20210007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of oral health impact profile for edentulous subjects

Abstract: PurposeThe validated translations of the OHIP-EDENT exist in different languages; however, there is no reliable and validated Turkish translation. The present study was conducted to evaluate the reliability and to validate the Oral Health Impact Profile in edentulous subjects translated to Turkish (OHIP-EDENT-T). Materials and MethodsThe study sample included 104 conventional complete denture wearers (58 women and 46 men, mean age: 61.13 ± 9.43 years). The original English version of OHIP-EDENT was translated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants assigned into the MDI-OD group received four ball-type MDIs in sites of their previous second incisors ( 32 , 42 ) and first premolars ( 34 , 44 ). The Dentium, South Korea mini-implants were 2.0-2.5 mm wide and 10-14 mm long.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants assigned into the MDI-OD group received four ball-type MDIs in sites of their previous second incisors ( 32 , 42 ) and first premolars ( 34 , 44 ). The Dentium, South Korea mini-implants were 2.0-2.5 mm wide and 10-14 mm long.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OHIP-EDENT is scored between 0 and 76; where 0 represented the maximum positive score (high quality of life) and 76 represented the worst score (low quality of life). 29 The OHIP-EDENT was translated into Arabic by 2 translators. An Arabic version was introduced to each patient, who was interviewed by 2 different clinicians, and the clinician registered any problems that patients had demonstrated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It ranges from 0 to 76. The total score was calculated by adding the answers to all the questions The lowest score showed an acceptable perception of an individual's oral situation, and therefore better satisfaction and quality of life 29 . The linear measurements of the peri-implant marginal bone loss and OHIP-EDENT scores in each group were calculated, tabulated, and statistically analyzed.…”
Section: Oral Health-related Quality Of Life Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%