2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0012162203000021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Observational Gait Scale in children with spastic diplegia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to a lack of congruity in the terminology. For example, a 'narrow base of support' is defined in the literature as having poor knee clearance [28]. This raises questions as to whether a child who walks with their knees together in an adducted position and the feet positioned at normal distance apart has a narrow or normal base of support [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be related to a lack of congruity in the terminology. For example, a 'narrow base of support' is defined in the literature as having poor knee clearance [28]. This raises questions as to whether a child who walks with their knees together in an adducted position and the feet positioned at normal distance apart has a narrow or normal base of support [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first four sections of the OGS were found to have moderate to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability when used with older children with spastic diplegic CP, while base of support and hindfoot position had poor to substantial intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (Mackey, Lobb, Walt, and Stott, 2003). When using observational gait assessment with children with CP, it has been recommended that longitudinal assessments of an individual should be completed by one rater to improve reliability (Maathuis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OGS was used to assess changes in the walking pattern before and after the overground BWS gait training (Mackey et al, 2003). This assessment consisted of a 4-point Likert scale that rated the knee's position at midstance, position of the foot at initial contact, position of the foot at midstance, timing of heel rise, position of the hind foot at midstance, width of the base of support, and use of an assistive device.…”
Section: Observational Gait Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous research, our primary outcome measure was preferred walking speed. Our secondary outcome measures were changes in cadence, Gross Motor Function Measure Section E (Russell, Rosenbaum, Avery, & Lane, 2002), the Supported Walker Ambulation Performance Scale (SWAPS) (Malouin, Richards, Menier, Dumas, & Marcoux, 1997), and the Observational Gait Scale (OGS) (Mackey, Lobb, Walt, & Stott, 2003). Lastly, we described differences between younger and older participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%