2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire compared to calibrated accelerometer cut-off points in the quantification of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in older adults

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim was to determine the reliability and validity of IPAQ measured sedentary behaviour (SB) and moderate–vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in older persons whilst examining any sex differences in reliability and validity results.Method89 participants (73.7 ± 6.3 years, 54% female) completed the IPAQ. Participants were fitted with a thigh mounted triaxial accelerometer (GeneActiv Original) for seven consecutive days and subsequently completed a second IPAQ.ResultsIPAQ showed weak reliability quali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The modified Baecke questionnaire demonstrated reliability across 3 studies . The HAP, IPEQ, and STAR demonstrated adequate reliability in 1 study each , the IPAQ‐SF in 7 studies , and the PASE in 8 studies both showed results of a mix of reliability above and below adequate reliability . Measurement error in the PASE had been assessed in 1 study, showing a relatively small standard error of measurement (range 3.3–8.5) compared to the maximal scoring range of the PASE (range 0–400) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The modified Baecke questionnaire demonstrated reliability across 3 studies . The HAP, IPEQ, and STAR demonstrated adequate reliability in 1 study each , the IPAQ‐SF in 7 studies , and the PASE in 8 studies both showed results of a mix of reliability above and below adequate reliability . Measurement error in the PASE had been assessed in 1 study, showing a relatively small standard error of measurement (range 3.3–8.5) compared to the maximal scoring range of the PASE (range 0–400) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The IPAQ‐SF was evaluated for construct validity in 9 studies, and correlations with accelerometers ranged from nonsignificant to moderate . The PASE was evaluated for construct validity in 5 studies, and correlations with accelerometers ranged from low to moderate . The SQUASH demonstrated high agreement with heart monitoring in a single study .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the TMM study and MEC study only quantified physical activity using a questionnaire, which is different from the accelerometer-based measurement used by J-MICC. Physical activity questionnaires do not correlate well with accelerometer-based measurements in young and old individuals 3033 . Hence, we are unable to assess physical activity behavior among the three cohorts using a harmonized approach (i.e., accelerometer).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…en los que la validez de este cuestionario también ha sido puesta en duda. Así, la versión brasileña mostró una ausencia de asociación significativa con los datos registrados a través de podómetro 23 mientras que, recientemente, Ryan y col 24 , tras comparar las puntuaciones obtenidas en la versión inglesa con los datos registrados por acelerómetros, concluyeron que el IPAQ no es una herramienta válida para estimar la cantidad de AF realizada por las personas mayores. Otro hecho destacable del IPAQ-E es la ausencia de correlación entre el ítem de valoración tiempo sentado y la CF.…”
Section: Vremunclassified