Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease

Younus, Mohammad; Wang, Dimiao; Yu, Fangfang; Hua, Fang; Guo, Xiong

doi:10.1007/s00296-017-3723-4

Cited by 13 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was confirmed that the Polish version of the tool was consistent over time (ICC value of 0.91). Younus et al also confirmed the very good repeatability of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 [ 34 ], and likewise, good consistency over time (1 week) was also affirmed by Moreira et al, who used the test–retest method and obtained an ICC of 0.77 [ 37 ]. Similar test–retest values (ICC value of 0.88) were obtained by Marom et al [ 38 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

“…In addition, Carlozzi et al, examining disability using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 among people with Huntington's disease, obtained a Cronbach's α value for the entire tool of 0.94, and for individual domains, Cronbach's α ranged from 0.74 to 0.90 [28]. Younus et al, studying the psychometric values of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease obtained Cronbach's α values for individual domains ranging from 0.70 to 0.91 [34]. Axelsson et al also confirmed the high scale score reliability of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with anxiety and stress disorders (Cronbach's α values were in the range of 0.83-0.92) [35].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The assessment of disability in a population is an important part of public health management. In this article, we examine the psychometric properties and validation of the Polish version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. (12-item WHODAS 2.0). Methods: A systematic random sample comprised 584 adult urban residents. The Polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire were used to assess disability and quality of life, respectively. Basic sociodemographic data and selected healthrelated data (e.g., pain and depressive moods) were also collected. Results: Good scale score reliability for the entire tool was confirmed in the study population (Cronbach's α = 0.90; Composite reliability = 0.95). In confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), satisfactory values of the fit indices were obtained (comparative fit index, CFI = 0.999; Tucker-Lewis Index, TLI = 0.999; root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA = 0.004; standardized root mean square residual, SRMR = 0.043, p = 0.454). Good consistency was noted over time (correlation coefficient = 0.88). The tool was found to have an appropriate level of validity. Conclusions: We found that the 12-item WHODAS is short and easy to use, and it is suitable for use in the form of an interview during screening tests. This tool is appropriate for measuring the health status, functioning, and disability of an average population. It may be more relevant for studying populations with health problems. The 12item WHODAS can be used to successfully obtain information about the general level of disability in a population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A complex scoring method was used, in which the scores within each domain and all six domains were summed and converted to an overall score ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = no disability; 100 = full disability). We used the Chinese version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 [25], and the Cronbach's alpha and ICCs for the six domains in KBD patients ranged from 0.70 to 0.91 and 0.69 to 0.85, respectively [12].…”

Section: Assessment Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…a A representative patient severely affected with KBD (female, 57 years old, height 102 cm), which manifested as deformed and shortened fingers, a short stature and limited motion of the joints in the extremities. b & c Images and radiographic images of the bilateral hands of this patient, showing deformed fingers and metaphyseal lesions in the phalanges joint dysfunction index (JDI) [11] and the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) [12]. The WOMAC is a well-known self-administered instrument that was developed for the assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease

Yang

Wang

et al. 2020

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Several questionnaires have been used to assess the health status of patients with Kashin-Beck disease (KBD) in clinical trials, but the evidence regarding the responsiveness of these instruments in KBD patients is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in KBD patients undergoing intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA). Methods: A sample of 232 KBD patients treated with intra-articular injection of HA completed the WOMAC, 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and joint dysfunction index (JDI) both pre-and post-treatment. Responsiveness was assessed using correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: Overall, there were significant improvements in the mean scores on the WOMAC and on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0, except for in the cognition domain. Correlation analysis showed that changes in the WOMAC and 12item WHODAS 2.0 scores had moderate or weak positive associations with the changes in the JDI. However, acceptable areas under the ROC curve (value > 0.7) were found for all domains and for the total score on the WOMAC, but only for the mobility domain and the total score on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0. Conclusions: These results demonstrated that the WOMAC was more responsive than the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in KBD patients treated with intra-articular injection of HA. Our findings support the continued use of the WOMAC as an outcome measure in assessing disability in KBD patients.

show abstract

Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease

Cited by 13 publications

References 25 publications

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease

Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About