2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02667.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy

Abstract: IntroductionA reliable and valid clinical tool to capture symptoms and signs of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) for use in clinical research trials is urgently needed. The validated Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) was modified to improve sensitivity to early DSP changes. We aimed to assess the reproducibility of this modified tool, the mTCNS and to determine its validity relative to the precursor TCNS.MethodsSixty-five patients (six Type 1, 59 Type 2 diabetes) with diabetes duration 13 ± 8 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
133
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
133
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional screening methods for DSPN consist of different questionnaires including the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Neurological Symptom Score (NSS), Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), Neuropathy Impairment Score–Lower Limb, Utah Early Neuropathy Scale and so on10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Each of these questionnaires emphasizes different clinical manifestations, and proves to be quite time‐consuming in everyday clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional screening methods for DSPN consist of different questionnaires including the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Neurological Symptom Score (NSS), Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), Neuropathy Impairment Score–Lower Limb, Utah Early Neuropathy Scale and so on10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Each of these questionnaires emphasizes different clinical manifestations, and proves to be quite time‐consuming in everyday clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of DPN was based on clinical examinations using the modified mTCNS, as described previously (11). It consists of graded symptoms (foot pain, numbness, tingling, weakness, ataxia and upper limb symptoms) and a sensory test (pinprick, temperature, light touch, vibration and position sense) score associated with DPN in the judgment of the examiner.…”
Section: Assessment Of Diabetic Neuropathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several instruments (9,10) have developed for use in clinical practice because clinical evaluation of DPN is complex. The modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS) (11) has recently proven to have sufficient reliability and validity to capture mild to moderate symptoms and signs of DPN. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical usefulness of Neuropad test for assessment of DPN diagnosed through mTCNS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, it remains one of the few scores that have been validated against morphometry, with a significant negative correlation with sural nerve fiber density (r 2 = -0.256, p < 0.0001). Subsequently, the authors published a modification, the mTCNS, to better capture the early sensory abnormalities of DSPN, and to eliminate muscle reflex tests which are notoriously variable between raters [19]. In a recent study comparing seven neuropathy composite scores in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and symptomatic early neuropathy of less than 2 years' duration, mTCNS was the strongest discriminant, with an AUC of 0.99 (p = 0.006) for all subjects with neuropathy [20].…”
Section: Severity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%