1991
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
298
3
7

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
18
298
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have found the BSI-18 to have adequate reliability (coefficient alpha = .89) and convergent validity (correlation with full 53 item version = .84) (30). Evidence supports the use of the GSI as a measure of the degree of general psychopathology, rather than the use of individual subscales (31). Following the BSI-18 scoring instructions, raw scores were converted to T-scores and a case was considered positive if T > 62 (29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Previous reports have found the BSI-18 to have adequate reliability (coefficient alpha = .89) and convergent validity (correlation with full 53 item version = .84) (30). Evidence supports the use of the GSI as a measure of the degree of general psychopathology, rather than the use of individual subscales (31). Following the BSI-18 scoring instructions, raw scores were converted to T-scores and a case was considered positive if T > 62 (29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Four scales, including Somatization, Interpersonal Sensitivity, Depression, and Anxiety, were used in this study. Each of the scales has demonstrated a high degree of internal consistency with similar populations (Benishek, Hayes, Bieschke, & Stoffelmayr, 1998;Boulet & Boss, 1991). Cronbach's alpha coefficients in this sample were .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 for Somatization, .70 for Interpersonal Sensitivity, .81 for Depression, and .85 for Anxiety. Although studies examining the factor structure have been inconclusive, they have shown the utility of the scales as a measure of global distress (Beneshik et al, 1998;Boulet & Boss, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest part of the instrument, according to validation studies, is the Global Severity Index (GSI), which summarizes the level of distress across the syndrome subscales (Peterson, 1989). The Global Severity Index is touted as the "most sensitive" subscale in identifying psychopathology and has a test-retest reliability of .90 (Boulet & Boss, 1991). The construct and discriminate validity of the syndrome subscales are less impressive (Peterson, 1989), and factor analyses suggest a unidimensionality of the BSI (Piersma, Boes, & Reaume, 1994).…”
Section: Screening Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%