Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3)

Budnik-Przybylska, Dagmara; Szczypińska, Marta; Karasiewicz, Karol

doi:10.5114/cipp.2016.63218

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This specific type of imagery might be the consequence of previous experiences and training in both studied groups. This is in line with previous studies on athletes, including elite athletes, who reported higher imagery ability [15,16,48,49,50] compared to novices and nonathletes. Therefore, imagery is a skill that improves with practice [51], and elite athletes use it more frequently and deliberately [52].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Can Personality Factors and Body Esteem Predict Imagery Ability in Dancers?

Budnik-Przybylska

Kaźmierczak

Przybylski

et al. 2019

Sports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dancing is mainly regarded as a form of art, which has been linked to the expression of emotions. Imagery is a well-known technique for enhancing performance. Additionally, specific personality traits are likely to facilitate performance. In the dancer’s performance, regarding the body as a tool is crucial. The following study examines personality and perceived body esteem as predictors of imagery ability in professional dancers. We analyzed two experimental groups, namely ballet dancers and professional dancers of other styles, and a control group. A sample of 249 people took part in the study: 155 women and 94 men aged 18–56 years. Participants filled in The Imagination in Sport Questionnaire and Polish adaptations of the Big Five Inventory—Short and the Body Esteem Scale. Results indicated that while each experimental group differed significantly from the control group in terms of their imagery ability, there were no differences between the two experimental groups. Findings revealed that personality traits, mainly higher openness to experience, and body esteem, mainly related to physical condition, were significant predictors of higher imagery ability in all groups.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Can Personality Factors and Body Esteem Predict Imagery Ability in Dancers?

Budnik-Przybylska

Kaźmierczak

Przybylski

et al. 2019

Sports

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This analysis strongly differentiated among the three factors. The KI, IVI and EVI dimensions of the MIQ-3f confirmed the results obtained in previous studies (Budnik-Przybylska, Szczypińska, & Karasiewicz, 2016, Mendes et al, 2016. Second, the reliability of the MIQ-3f, which was evaluated in terms of internal consistency and repeatability, was very good.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Second, there are few practitioners in sports who are supposed to favor the use of IVI, such as those participating in slalom-based activities; thus, larger sample sizes should be considered in future research in which the test of concurrent validity should be included. Third, the test-retest interval used in the current study (i.e., more than two weeks) could be considered insufficient and thus favor the use of memory, although this interval is similar to that used in similar studies (Budnik-Przybylska et al, 2016;Loison et al, 2013;Lorant & Gaillot, 2004;Paravlić, Pišot, & Mitić, 2018 for examples). Finally, postquestionnaire interviews would have been necessary to control in greater detail whether/how participant made a clear distinction between IVI and KI.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

French translation and validation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-third version (MIQ-3f)

Robin¹,

Coudevylle²,

Guillot

et al. 2020

Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Imagery ability is a variable influencing the effectiveness of imagery practice that can be estimated by means of questionnaires. Among them, the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, translated and validated in French, is widely used by French speakers. However, it does not allow for the distinction between the two visual imagery perspectives (internal vs. external). The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 has been recently proposed in the English literature to differentiate between the ease of performing internal visual, external visual and kinesthetic imagery. The aim of this study was to translate and validate a French version of this questionnaire (MIQ-3f). Method: We examined the validity of constructs, internal consistency, and test-retest inter-rate reliability of the visual and kinesthetic items of the MIQ-3f in 272 healthy participants (Mage = 20.26 years, SD = 1.73). Results: The internal consistency (composite reliability scores ≥ 0.88 for the three subscales) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.87 for visual internal imagery, 0.86 for visual external imagery, and 0.88 for kinesthetic imagery) of the MIQ-3f were satisfactory. The three-factor structure (with 4 items for each factor) was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. The MIQ-3f appears to be a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to assess imagery ability in French speakers.

show abstract

“…Doubtful if FOLO could be used as external criterion. Sport Budnik-Przybylska et al 2016 [ 78 ] PL PO Athletes 276 21.3 102♀, 174♂ Construct validity- structural validity CFA with maximum likehood estimation confirmed the three-factor (external, internal and kinaesthetic) structure. χ 2 =76.98, df=51, CFI=0.93, GFI=0.89, AGFI=0.83, RMR=0.25, RMSEA=0.04 Very good + Accepted model fit: CFI, GFI >0.95, or SRMR <0.08, or RMSEA <0.06.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 95%

“… Sport Williams et al 2012 3 [ 31 ] CA E Athletes 97 19.5 58♀, 39♂ Internal consistency CR=0.89 external, 0.81 internal and 0.89 kinaesthetic AVE=0.66 external, 0.51 internal and 0.67 kinaesthetic Very good + Williams et al 2012 3 [ 31 ] = results of study 3. Sport Budnik-Przybylska et al 2016 [ 78 ] PL PO Athletes 47 NR NR Test-retest External r =0.70 Internal r =0.62 Kinaesthetic r =0.65 Doubtful − Small sample size for this analysis. No information if the participants were stable.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties

Suica

Behrendt

Gäumann

et al. 2022

BMC Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Over the last two centuries, researchers developed several assessments to evaluate the multidimensional construct of imagery. However, no comprehensive systematic review (SR) exists for imagery ability evaluation methods and an in-depth quality evaluation of their psychometric properties. Methods We performed a comprehensive systematic search in six databases in the disciplines of sport, psychology, medicine, education: SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC. Two reviewers independently identified and screened articles for selection. COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. All included assessments were evaluated for quality using criteria for good measurement properties. The evidence synthesis was summarised by using the GRADE approach. Results In total, 121 articles reporting 155 studies and describing 65 assessments were included. We categorised assessments based on their construct on: (1) motor imagery (n = 15), (2) mental imagery (n = 48) and (3) mental chronometry (n = 2). Methodological quality of studies was mainly doubtful or inadequate. The psychometric properties of most assessments were insufficient or indeterminate. The best rated assessments with sufficient psychometric properties were MIQ, MIQ-R, MIQ-3, and VMIQ-2 for evaluation of motor imagery ability. Regarding mental imagery evaluation, only SIAQ and VVIQ showed sufficient psychometric properties. Conclusion Various assessments exist to evaluate an individual’s imagery ability within different dimensions or modalities of imagery in different disciplines. However, the psychometric properties of most assessments are insufficient or indeterminate. Several assessments should be revised and further validated. Moreover, most studies were only evaluated with students. Further cross-disciplinary validation studies are needed including older populations with a larger age range. Our findings allow clinicians, coaches, teachers, and researchers to select a suitable imagery ability assessment for their setting and goals based on information about the focus and quality of the assessments. Systematic reviews register PROSPERO CRD42017077004.

show abstract

Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3)

Cited by 8 publications

References 31 publications

Can Personality Factors and Body Esteem Predict Imagery Ability in Dancers?

Can Personality Factors and Body Esteem Predict Imagery Ability in Dancers?

French translation and validation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-third version (MIQ-3f)

Imagery ability assessments: a cross-disciplinary systematic review and quality evaluation of psychometric properties

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About