2019
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1668975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the needs of specific BCI users (the efficacy provided by BCI is required to solve their problems) and their capabilities, and taking full account of their living or working environment (which may have some uniqueness), an intelligent environment suitable for the operation and operation of a specific BCI system (such as different BCI paradigms) can be built, considering user preferences for the intelligent environment. Designing such a personalized intelligent environment is conducive to enhancing the interaction performance between the BCI system and users and improving the user’s sense of experience and satisfaction [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Personalized Bci Design Research and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the needs of specific BCI users (the efficacy provided by BCI is required to solve their problems) and their capabilities, and taking full account of their living or working environment (which may have some uniqueness), an intelligent environment suitable for the operation and operation of a specific BCI system (such as different BCI paradigms) can be built, considering user preferences for the intelligent environment. Designing such a personalized intelligent environment is conducive to enhancing the interaction performance between the BCI system and users and improving the user’s sense of experience and satisfaction [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Personalized Bci Design Research and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Figure 4 also includes a user-specific visual analog scale [ 2 , 58 ] and an evaluation of a specific user’s overall satisfaction with BCI [ 30 , 54 ]. The latter can use Quest 2.0 and its extension form of user satisfaction with auxiliary technology [ 56 , 58 , 59 ]. In particular, interview/follow-up evaluation with specific users is necessary and important, in which four issues need to be considered when BCI technology is converted into practical application [ 1 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Personalized Bci Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) [22][23][24], the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-BREF) [25,26], and the Spinal Cord Injury Falls Concern Scale (SCI-FCS) [27,28] were utilized.…”
Section: Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the joint analysis of both samples, it was found that the internal consistency values for test and retest ranged from 0.83 to 0.89. The Italian (α = 0.74) and Dutch versions (α = 0.73 and 0.85) shows similar values with respect to the internal consistency [ 15 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…QUEST–2.0 has already been translated and validated into different languages, and the versions present good internal consistency (0.79–0.90) and test–retest reliability (0.64–0.97) [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. A recently published study demonstrates the validity and reliability of QUEST-IT 2.0 for an Italian population using mobility assistive devices [ 22 ] and for athletes who use a sports wheelchair [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%