2021
DOI: 10.26603/001c.23427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Functional Movement Screen™ with a Modified Scoring System for Young Adults with Low Back Pain

Abstract: BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is one of the most common complaints in individuals who seek medical care and is a leading cause of movement impairments. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) was developed to evaluate neuromuscular impairments during movement. However, the reliability and validity of the FMS™ have not yet been established for the LBP population because of a limitation of its original scoring system. PurposeThe purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of the FMS™ with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We registered higher SEM and MDC values than those reported in people with low back pain (SEM = 0.33 and MDC = 0.90) when analysing the test–retest reliability data provided by the trained assessor (Alkhathami et al . 2021 ). However, when comparing the data provided by the novice assessors, SEM and MDC values were similar to the ones registered by other inexpert examiners (SEM = 0.98 and MDC = 2.07) (Teyhen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We registered higher SEM and MDC values than those reported in people with low back pain (SEM = 0.33 and MDC = 0.90) when analysing the test–retest reliability data provided by the trained assessor (Alkhathami et al . 2021 ). However, when comparing the data provided by the novice assessors, SEM and MDC values were similar to the ones registered by other inexpert examiners (SEM = 0.98 and MDC = 2.07) (Teyhen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods to measure core muscle activation have sensitivity and accuracy issues associated with isolated use of surface electromyography [39], or pressure biofeedback [40]. Whilst functional movement tests are able to distinguish between those with and without low back pain, there is limited specificity with regards to local core muscle and global trunk muscle contributions [41]. Core muscles were defined to be transversus abdominis, lumbar multifidus, and internal oblique muscles, and distinguished from global trunk muscles [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of this modified FMS TM scoring system have been established previously with excellent inter-rater reliability in those with LBP (ICC = 0.99). 31 Lastly, a composite score ranging from 0 to 21 is calculated to indicate the overall quality of movement performance, with a higher score indicating higher quality of movement performance. A score of 14 or lower on the original FMS TM scoring system indicates that the participant could have a higher risk for future injury.…”
Section: Functional Movement Screen Tmmentioning
confidence: 99%